
photo (c) Lee
O'Dell/Shutterstock |
Shop Small...And Start a Revolution –
March 17, 2012
As I
noted here last month,
I wrote
an article (now
online) for Natural Life Magazine’s
March/April 2012 issue about how seemingly small decisions about our purchasing
habits can make us part of a grassroots effort to fix what is wrong with our
economy. But doing that is not easy, and here’s
why.
Now that subscribers have had the issue for a few weeks,
I’ve received some feedback. A number of readers thanked me for what they
believe is an important article that encourages important initiatives. One
person suggested that my recommendations – such as joining a food co-op or CSA;
buying locally made goods; using credit unions instead of banks; dealing
directly with the producer; frequenting small, independently-owned businesses;
and avoiding the corporate culture (singling out Amazon.com) – are far from
small decisions and take major effort. And one woman called me names, including
“pretentious,” “arrogant,” and the bearer of “misinformed misogynistic
propaganda.”
So is it difficult to change one’s spending habits in order
to turn around the old greed- and growth-based, winners versus losers economy
and create something more equitable and sustainable? It’s probably more of a
challenge in some places than in others. And not everyone has the time or
talents to create their own alternatives where none exist. But we make such
decisions (and undertake any extra effort that may be involved) based on
priorities, on how important we believe the problem or the outcome to be. As
business guru Seth Godin wrote on
his blog, “We say we want a revolution...Of course, what we say doesn't
matter so much. What we do is what matters....”
As for the name calling, there is
a study about branding out of the University of Illinois to explain that. Apparently,
many people go on the attack when someone criticizes their favorite brand
because it’s seen as a threat to their self-image (self-image is very important in our narcissistic society). So perhaps my insulter has an
emotional relationship (the study authors call it a self-brand connection or
SBC) with some brand or other and took my criticism of Amazon, for
instance, personally. Apparently, the residual effect of SBC is that people tend
to discount negative news about their favorite brands and even rewrite reality.
To summarize: If we’re to be part of an economic
revolution, we need to put our money where our mouths are…but that’s not easy
because the corporate culture has us hooked in. At the same time, the problems
can seem overwhelming and make us feel powerless sometimes. Individual action is
not the whole solution, of course, because the issues are systemic and bigger
than any one of us. But these personal lifestyle changes can make a difference,
if only we decide to make the effort.
Posted: 2012/03/17 11:05 AM