Wendy Priesnitz

About Wendy Priesnitz, author and editor of Natural Life Magazine, Life Learning Magazine, and Natural Child Magazine Archives of Wendy Priesnitz's blog Index of articles written by Wendy Priesnitz Like Wendy Priesnitz's page on Facebook Follow Wendy Priesnitz on Twitter Sponsor / advertise on Wendy Priesnitz's website Contact Wendy Priesnitz, author and editor of Natural Life Magazine, Life Learning Magazine, and Natural Child Magazine. Return to home page

Bookmark and Share

Sign up for
a free e-letter from
Wendy's company
Life Media


Natural Life Magazine
Life Learning Magazine
Natural Child Magazine
Challenging Assumptions in Education
Natural Life Magazine's Green & Healthy Homes
Life Learning: Lessons from the Educational Frontier
School Free
Bringing it Home: A Home Business Shart-up Guide for You and Your Family

Wendy Priesnitz

 

Blog Archives Highlights - Books

Philosophical Babies, Arrogant Adults – September 18, 2009
Alison Gopnik has a new book out entitled The Philosophical Baby (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009). I’ve been too busy doing magazine layout, trying to keep up with twitter and facebook, and finishing off about four other books to get very far into it yet. But it promises to be fascinating and wide-ranging. And I am not surprised. I first came across Gopnik’s work when I was doing research for my 2000 book Challenging Assumptions in Education. She had just released a research study that she co-authored, entitled The Scientist in the Crib (William Morrow, 1999). Her research found that babies’ brains are smarter, faster, more flexible and busier than adults.’ She wrote that, contrary to traditional beliefs about children, toddlers think in a logical manner, arriving at abstract principles early and quickly. “They think, draw conclusions, make predictions, look for explanations and even do experiments,” I quoted her as saying. Educated in Canada and the UK, she is now a professor of psychology at the University of California, Berkeley. And in this book, she continues to describe how babies are smarter, more imaginative and more conscious than adults. We really do need to get over our arrogance.
Posted: 2009/09/18 4:14 PM

Speed Reading – August 4, 2009
I’ve been playing around with Twitter as a tool for making more connections and telling more people about our work (http://twitter.com/WendyPriesnitz, http://twitter.com/NaturalLifeMag, and http://twitter.com/AlternatePress). True to my original concern about signing on to it, it’s fast. It requires me to write quickly, to post quickly, to keep checking other people’s tweets and to respond quickly. Otherwise, there seems to be no point. Unfortunately, I’m a relatively slow thinker and writer, so I’m feeling the pressure, even though I’m intrigued by the platform and think it could be a good thing for us. And what if it isn’t even about the content? It might be mostly about the connections – the networking. It makes me think about a book published a few years ago by Pierre Bayard, a professor of French literature at the University of Paris. In English, it was entitled How To Talk About Books You Haven’t Read (Bloomsbury USA, 2007). Bayard’s thesis seems to be that the associations that tie books together – book as a system – are more important than the actual content of the books. And that, in one sense, is what Twitter is doing – giving participants a speed reading version of what’s out there and how it all relates in the overall scheme of things. James Harkin expands on this idea in his book Lost in Cyburbia (Knopf Canada, 2009), connecting social media to systems theory and Marshall McLuhan’s idea about the medium being the message. This is all very depressing for a writer and editor, but I’m willing to go along for the ride awhile longer and see if Twitter helps me connect with more readers. The kind who read books and magazines.
Posted: 2009/08/04 11:11 AM

Change For the Sake of Our Children – July 27, 2009
Léandre Bergeron is a parent, social activist and writer whose article in the upcoming September/October issue of Natural Life magazine illuminates the respectful, trusting way of parenting and educating children that I’ve practiced and championed for the past 35 years. Léandre suggests that we treat our children as “distinguished guests” – people we respect and admire for who they are and who grace us with their presence. He has much more wisdom and experience to share in his new book For the Sake of Our Children, which we’ve just published and is now back from the printer and ready to be ordered.

Collectively, we have much work to do to own up to the damage our society does to our children through the ways we parent and educate. I sometimes wonder if we are willing to make the sweeping changes in our institutions, public policies and personal lives that are necessary to reverse that harm to our children and to our society. But, recently, as I was listening to an album of old tunes by singer/songwriter Leonard Cohen, I felt grateful for the increasing community of people who are pushing for those changes. We are, to paraphrase a line from Cohen’s song Anthem, taking advantage of the cracks that appear in everything, which is where the light gets in.
Posted: 2009/07/27 12:14 PM

A Life of Learning – July 15, 2009
Now that the book Turning Points: 27 Visionaries in Education Tell Their Own Stories (2009, Alternative Education Resource Organization) has been published, I have posted my contribution A Life of Learning:Empowering, Respecting, Trusting, Unschooling Children on this website. Enjoy!
Posted: 2009/07/15 6:19 PM

Business That's Small, Local and Personal – March 7, 2009
A certain website recently refused to accept a review copy of one of our books because we don’t sell on amazon.com and they therefore wouldn’t have an opportunity to earn their affiliate commission if they reviewed it. I have to wonder about the editorial integrity of websites (or magazines) that only report on things from which they make money, but that is just one of the effects of those massive, centralized, deep discount retailers. And that’s why I don’t sell to or buy from them.

One of the sustainability-focused foundations of our philosophy of doing business and living life is to help foster local self-reliance. Another thing that’s important to us is that small is beautiful. And a third is that the personal is political.

So whenever possible, we support local small businesses rather than large, faceless corporations. Independent booksellers can’t compete on price with the mega bookstores, online or otherwise. And often, people will take advantage of the local store’s great customer service and knowledge of books to choose titles, then go save some money online.  Amazon is huge (one-quarter of the US market) and getting larger all the time. It recently took over the British Columbia-based used and rare bookseller AbeBooks and also now owns a number of other companies, including Chrislands, which helps booksellers – including those who like to think they’re independent – create their own websites. The U.K.’s Independent Booksellers’ Network calls it “Amazon Eats the Bookselling World.”

I can’t fault anybody – especially these days – for trying to save a few dollars. But the independent retailers, book publishers and even authors and readers suffer from deep discounting. Like other businesses, many book publishers – even the big ones – are hurting these days, with some postponing their Spring lists, others laying off staff and a few hanging on by their fingernails. I fear that the continuing race to the bottom created by the demands of the mega retailers will ultimately mean fewer and poorer quality books published.

But wait a minute, you say. Most small and self-publishers need amazon and their ilk to sell books, even if they’re treated poorly. And many of the bloggers who review books are running small, often home-based and mom-run, businesses and depend on the affiliate revenue to pay their bills. Fortunately, there are alternatives. For instance, the American Booksellers Association (whose membership has plummeted to about 1,800 members from more than 4,000 15 years ago) recently created a book-linking feature called IndieBound that bloggers can use to point purchasers to local retailers, as an alternative to being an amazon affiliate. And my company? Well, we avoid amazon.com and its international cousins (you will see some of our books listed there, but that’s without our permission). We are keeping it small, local and personal. We love selling directly to our customers online via our own websites. (We’d rather save you the shipping charges than give a deep discount to amazon). And we sell to independent bookstores. (You’ll probably have to special order from your local store, but I think the wait is worth it. We have a slow food movement; maybe we now need to think about slow books!)

Sustainability is an interconnection of cultural, social, economic and environmental practices. It means taking care of where you live…and part of that involves building strong communities, with healthy, locally-owned businesses that sell good products at fair prices.

(Oh, and don’t ask me about the magazine distribution business – my rant would fill a book instead of this already-too-long blog posting. Let’s just say we’re working on bringing that one home.)
Posted: 2009/03/07 4:05 PM

Free to Be – November 11, 2008
I just had a chat with my youngest daughter Melanie about the fact that this is apparently the 35th anniversary of the book Free to Be You and Me by Marlo Thomas (a birth year that Melanie shares). It was part of the proliferation of books from that era that opposed gender stereotypes. But, more than that, it was about saluting values such as individuality, tolerance and happiness with one’s identity. It became an Emmy-winning television special and an album featuring such people as Mel Brooks, Diana Ross, Harry Belafonte, Carol Channing, Tom Smothers, Rosey Grier, Dick Cavett, Roberta Flack, Alan Alda and more. Oh, and check out this video with a very young Michael Jackson…go ahead, you’ll like it (and there are links to the rest of the video, like “Mommies are People,” which is one of my favorites.)  Marlo Thomas (perhaps better know as “That Girl” from 1970s television sitcom) turns 71 in a few weeks – yikes – and is married to the wonderfully progressive talk show host Phil Donahue. I read the book aloud over and over again and, apparently, my young daughters took the message in. Unfortunately, not everybody did and the book and music and their message are still needed today.

Posted:
2008/11/11 8:30 PM

At the Heart of Education – June 26, 2008
I’ve just begun re-reading Becoming Human by Jean Vanier, the founder of l’Arche, an international network of communities for people with intellectual disabilities. He writes about the need for trust as being key to helping people learn: “The belief in the inner beauty of each and every human being is at the heart of l’Arche, at the heart of all true education and at the heart of being human. As soon as we start selecting and judging people instead of welcoming them as they are – with their sometimes hidden beauty, as well as their more frequently visible weaknesses – we are reducing life, not fostering it. When we reveal to people our belief in them, their hidden beauty rises to the surface where it may be more clearly seen by all.”

Posted:
2008/06/26 12:34 PM

Mothers and Daughters – June 14, 2008
I am just back from visiting my daughter in her wonderful little house by the ocean. My reading material on the trip home was Urgent Message from Mother: Gather the Women, Save the World by Jean Shinoda Bolen (2005, Conari Press). She writes about the iconic photo of the earth in space that was taken by the crew of the Apollo space mission in the late 1960s: “The photograph of Mother Earth could only be taken by astronauts who were able to get far enough away to see the home planet from a distance. This is analogous to growing psychologically until we are mature enough to see our mothers as they are. Until we grow up, we have a self-centered relationship to our own mother. She is there to do for us, she is seen as it pleases us to see her, and not as separate from  our needs and assumptions. When we finally are able to see our mother as a person and can love her as she is, we usually are mature enough to also realize that she may need us.”
Posted:
2008/06/14 12:05 PM

The New Radicals – March 14, 2008
I recently picked up a book entitled We Are the New Radicals by Julia Moulden (McGraw-Hill, 2007). The book documents a phenomenon whereby people go off the career and money track to contribute to the social good. Some of the people profiled include a London librarian who left his job to retire to Scotland to record birdlife for the environmental movement; London Mayor Kehn Livingstone, who at first was criticized for charging extra for those who congested London traffic but now is imitated worldwide; Melissa Dyrdahl, who left her job as senior vice president of marketing at Adobe Systems to create Bring Light, Inc., a nonprofit website that connects donors with charities; and Chef Jamie Kennedy, who knew that there was something unsustainable about the way restaurants source ingredients and is now leading the movement toward local, sustainable cuisine.

Moulden says the new radicals are often boomers who as a generation already had been part of big social movements such as women’s rights and who want to continue principled work. The idea makes for a good read, but there’s nothing new about it. This is also known as social entrepreneurship and the term was first used in the literature on social change in the 1960s and ‘70s. It was certainly in use in the mid ‘70s when my husband and business partner Rolf and I went off the money track to start our “new radical/social entrepreneurship” publishing business. The term came into more widespread use in the 1980s and ‘90s, promoted by people like Harvard Business School professor Rosabeth Moss Kanter and Bill Drayton, the founder of Ashoka.

I believe that all entrepreneurship should be for the good of society, which is a very radical thought. I fail to see the point of any human enterprise that is otherwise, meaning that it destroys society, health or the environment. Likewise for any economic structure or policy that encourage destructiveness. Further, I think the notion that business=bad  and non-profit=good is very out-dated. But all of this makes me wonder: I’m already a radical, which means I can’t be a new one. So does that make me an old radical????
Posted:
2000/03/14 11:28 AM

Lightening My Mood to Match My Footprint – January 1, 2008
The global warming warnings are getting heavier by the moment now. In response, conscientious people are responding to the growing sense of urgency by lightening up our respective footprints. And much of the rest of the world’s population – with the notable exception of North American political leaders – seems likewise engaged, if polls are to be believed. A recent BBC poll of 22,000 people in 21 countries found that four out of five people are ready to make serious changes to their lifestyles to address climate change – even in the United States and China, the world’s two biggest emitters of carbon dioxide. 

Then why is my biggest problem not lightening my footprint but my mood? I keep wondering if all the sacrifices individuals are making really matter if governments and industry don’t stop dithering. And the greenwash gets me down. A few months ago, a PR firm sent me a whole case full of water in plastic bottles sourced from a spring in Fiji…accompanied by a press release telling me how it is the first bottled water brand to go carbon negative...quite a trick if they are planning to offset all that plastic and other packaging, as well as the processing and transportation involved with providing something I can get from my own kitchen faucet. Then I read about how an eight-passenger SUV won the “Green Car of the Year” award at the Los Angeles Auto Show. California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger was quoted as drooling, “They’ve proven that they can make beautiful cars, strong cars, keep the size, keep the safety, and all those kinds of things, and at the same time be more fuel efficient.” Maybe his heart is in the right place. After all, it is Hollywood. And Hollywood, says American author, columnist and blogger Arianna Huffington, “has gone from the capital of conspicuous consumption to the cutting edge of conspicuous conservation.” 

So I’m trying to keep my senses of humor and perspective. One of the ways I’m doing that is by working on the launch of Life Media’s third periodical – Natural Child Magazine, which grew out of the Natural Child column that has been a feature of Natural Life for so many years. Starting my own family almost 36 years ago is what got me on this road to a greener, fairer world, after all. Maybe the “natural children” in my family and their peers will be able to solve the problems my generation has created. 

Another way that I’m trying to stay hopeful for the future is by writing and reading. One of the writers whose books I’ll be exploring more thoroughly this year is a Tibetan Buddhist nun named Pema Chodron. She is a teacher at Gampo Abbey in Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, the first Tibetan monastery for Westerners. Her books have titles that are well suited to these times, including No Time to Lose, The Places that Scare You, When Things Fall Apart, and Start Where You Are. And what better place to begin than with a quote from the latter title: “The best gift you can give yourself is to lighten up.” 

Enjoy 2008 and keep a light heart to accompany your lightened footprint.
Posted: 2000/01/01 10:25 PM

Sharing the Pleasure of Books – November 19, 2007
I’m always skeptical about reports like the one released today by the National Endowment for the Arts, suggesting that people (in this case Americans) are reading less. In spite of the increase in the number of teen fiction books and the Harry Potter phenomenon, this study claims that young people are reading fewer books voluntarily and comprehending less.

Some of my skepticism relates to the fact that computer use is seen as a villain rather than an alternative source of words to be read, and that comprehension is based on my old enemy standardized tests. But I am happy to read that NEA chairman Dana Gioia feels this supposed decline in reading is an important socio-economic issue and is calling for changes “in the way we’re educating kids, especially in high school and college. We need to reconnect reading with pleasure and enlightenment.” Now there’s an earth-shattering idea!

Of course, it’s an idea that unschoolers have known about all along. And a couple in Ottawa has created a terrific tool for families who like to read. It’s a children’s book podcast called Just One More Book! Three times a week, Andrea Ross and Mark Blevis sit at a table in their favorite coffee shop and record their conversation about the children’s books their family (they have two young daughters) loves and why they love them. They also feature weekly interviews with authors, literacy related discussions and audio reviews submitted by listeners. Episodes range in length from five to 30 minutes and can be played directly from the website or downloaded to an iPod for listening on the go. Through this podcast and its website, this family is building a lively, interactive community linking children’s book authors, illustrators, readers (parents and children) and publishers. Here’s to reading for pleasure and enlightenment! (Oh, and thanks for reading this blog...even if it is not a book.)
Posted: 2007/11/19 9:05 AM

Learning from the Learners – September 2, 2007
The month I graduated from teachers’ college – June, 1969 – Herbert Kohl’s book The Open Classroom (Random House, 1969) was published. I read it that summer and perhaps it contributed to the frustration I felt in my first (and last) few months as a classroom teacher. In the book, Kohl advocates an organic, realistic and less patriarchal approach to being a teacher in a public school – something that I wasn’t able to envision, let alone implement, so I resigned, never to teach school again. And the rest of my educational advocacy career is, as they say, history. Kohl’s output now numbers more than 40 books, including I Won’t Learn From You (Milkweed Editions, 1991), in which he suggests that learning not to learn is a difficult, intellectual activity that is a manifestation of resistance to oppression and a sign of a survivor in a hostile environment.

I’ve just finished his latest book, a memoir called Painting Chinese: A Lifelong Teacher Gains the Wisdom of Youth (Bloomsbury, 2007). Honestly and humbly, Kohl describes how, late in a productive life and searching for something new to engage in, he stumbled into a Chinese painting class…where his fellow students were all young Chinese children. He writes about studying alongside the children while reflecting on his life. Painting took on a meditative quality and helped him come to terms with waning energy and the cancellation of a beloved university program. But more importantly to me, the supportive environment and hands-on, noncompetitive learning process he experienced in the painting classes led him to articulate things he’s danced around in his long career as writer, educator and social justice advocate. Kohl’s body of work is focused on helping teachers fit the square peg of unstructured creative learning into the round hole of school environments. Learning with children rather than teaching them has given him a seemingly new perspective. “Children,” he writes, “when unencumbered by adult demands and channeling educational structures, are extraordinary watchers and learn through what they see and experience.”
Posted: 2007/09/02 12:58 PM

A Potholder Hug – August 12, 2007
Recently I’ve noticed that cooking makes me emotional. Or, rather, cooking certain dishes has that effect on me. The slow and repetitive pouring, waiting and flipping of pancake preparation on a Sunday morning inevitably makes me teary-eyed and nostalgic for my mother’s pancakes at those oh-so-long ago weekend family breakfasts. And the other day, the fragrant yeast working, miraculous dough rising and energetic kneading of bread baking brought both a tear and a smile as I remembered how each of my young daughters approached that same project in such different ways: Heidi with her determination and neatness, and Melanie with her playful abandon.

I put this emotionalism down to family circumstances and my age until I neared the end of the book Animal, Vegetable, Miracle: A Year of Food Life by Barbara Kingsolver. This is the story of how the author’s family documented a year of procuring as much of their food as possible from neighboring farms and their own backyard. In one chapter, Kingsolver writes about how food anchors holiday traditions and how she – somewhat like I – had subconsciously “spent years denying the good in that.” Fortunately, like I did, she got over that and now embraces all the food-related celebrations, including one at the beginning of November called Dia de los Muertos – the Mexican Day of the Dead. As she describes it, this entirely happy ritual has its roots in Aztec culture, where the Lady of the Dead presided over rituals (many food-related) that welcomed dead friends and ancestors back among the living. Aside from the fact that Dia de los Muertos seems like a welcome antidote to Hallowe’en, which I have never enjoyed because it characterizes death as grotesque and scary, it creates a reason for remembering – a “potholder hug” as Kingsolver dubs it with her gentle wit. As I read her words: “When I cultivate my garden I’m spending time with my grandfather, sometimes recalling deeply buried memories of him,” I realized the source of my recent kitchen emotionalism. When I’m cooking certain dishes, I am experiencing the emotions attached to the person who taught me how to cook a certain dish, or with whom I used to cook it. And I give those memories a potholder hug.
Posted: 2007/08/12 12:59 PM

A World-Changing Legacy – May 27, 2007
Today, I’ve been thinking about Rachel Carson, the author of Silent Spring, the bestselling book credited with launching the modern environment movement – she is sometimes called “the mother of environmentalism.” Today (three days before my birthday) would have been her 100th birthday. Silent Spring was the first book I read on environmental issues, somewhere around 1972 or 73. It warned of the dangers to ecosystems from the overuse of pesticides. When the book was published in 1962, Carson, who was a scientist as well the writer of lyrical prose, was viciously and personally attacked (as not knowing what she was talking about and for being a woman and therefore not a real scientist, among other things) by pesticide manufacturers, including Monsanto. But her words were eventually given a great deal of credence and the book is credited with leading to the ban on DDT. Unfortunately, she is once again being attacked by the conservatives, who are arguing that the banning of DDT led to unnecessary deaths due to malaria. Here’s an interview posted today with her biographer Linda Lear, which addresses that backlash. Ironically, Carson was fighting breast cancer while fighting the critics of her book…and she died on April 14, 1964 at the age of 56 – just one year younger than I am now. Her other books are perhaps not as well known, but are terrific reads: My favorite is The Sea Around Us, which won a National Book Award in 1951. Her science and nature writing was also serialized in magazines. In her book A Sense of Wonder, she wrote: “Those who dwell, as scientists or laymen, among the beauties of the earth are never alone or weary in life…Those who contemplate the beauty of the earth find reserves of strength that will endure as long as life lasts.”
Posted: 2007/05/27 8:04 PM

Broadening Their Horizons – February 1, 2007
From time to time, a misguided parent finds what he/she regards as an objectionable book in their child’s backpack and goes running to the school or local library with censorship on their mind. The latest incident that I’ve heard about took place recently in a Toronto suburb. The Peel Catholic school board has pulled the award-winning novel Snow Falling on Cedars from high school library shelves after one parent complained about its sexual content. School officials were quick to point out that the 12-year-old book, which has been the subject of controversy and bans in the U.S. as well, hasn’t been banned…although what else can one call it if the book isn’t available to students?

This is a novel about significant social issues like racism and morality.  Its content is pretty innocuous compared to what’s available to teens on the Internet and in movies (and the book was actually made into an Oscar-nominated film.) And there is, for me, a fascinating irony here. The author is David Guterson. He was a high school English teacher before he was able to support himself as a novelist. And, as the father of four, he was/is a homeschooler whose book Family Matters: Why Homeschooling Makes Sense was first published in 1992. In it, he talks about the complete breakdown of our school systems, including their increasing social irrelevancy. I don’t remember if he talked about censorship specifically, but his idea of homeschooling (a term that he said he hoped would disappear from use, a sentiment with which I heartily agree) is to broaden his children’s horizons, which includes allowing culture to have a life outside of classrooms. Try to tell  that to the censors...parents and school officials alike.
Posted: 2007/02/01 11:48 AM

Learning from Living …and Video Games – September 1, 2006
I have been reading “Everything Bad is Good For You”, a rationale for how popular culture is making us smarter rather than dumbing us down. It’s an interesting hypothesis, similar to the article we ran two years ago in Life Learning by Pam Laricchia entitled “Everything I Needed to Know I Learned From Video Games.” Book author Steven Johnson compares the cognitive stimulation of a ten-year-old 100 years ago to today, which he says includes “following dozens of professional sports teams; shifting effortlessly from phone to IM to e-mail in communicating with friends; probing and telescoping through immense virtual worlds; adopting and troubleshooting new media technologies without flinching.” He continues, “Their classrooms may be overcrowded and their teachers underpaid, but in the world outside of school, their brains are being challenged at every turn by new forms of media and technology that cultivate sophisticated problem-solving skills.”

Although Johnson doesn’t say so, this is a great argument for life learning. There is another not-bad one (plus a plug for Life Learning magazine) in yesterday’s Kansas City Star. Thanks to the local unschooling group there, the members of which I assume passed along our contact info to the reporter.
Posted: 2006/09/01 3:48 PM

September University – July 24, 2006
Yesterday, I received an update from colleague and occasional Life Learning contributor Charles Hayes. He is promoting a new way of aging, with the aim of erasing the notion of retirement from our vocabulary. And he’s dubbed it “September University.” He writes, “September University…is a vision of retirement that replaces a time devoted to doing very little with a time of reflection, when people who’ve entered the September of life have the opportunity to make their greatest contribution to the generations to follow. A September University frame of mind means looking forward to sifting through a half-century or more of experience, sorting those things that are truly important from those that aren’t, and finding ways to pass on that wisdom.” His sense is that many people were so turned-off learning by their formal education experiences that they avoid the kind of contemplation and knowledge-creation that the world so badly needs. Hayes has been writing about self-education for more than two decades. He has published five books on the subject and one novel. His latest book, The Rapture of Maturity: A Legacy of Lifelong Learning, is concerned with using our knowledge and experience in our later years and leaving the world a better place in the process. And he has a new book in progress entitled September University: Rediscover the Wonder of Existence and Help Change the World. He’s set up an online dialog, accessible on the September-U website for people who are interested in exploring the concept.
Posted: 2006/07/24 5:29 PM

A Life That Mattered – April 25, 2006
Author, activist (although she preferred to call herself a citizen who occasionally had to protest stupidity), critic of authority, self-made economist, intellectual with little formal schooling, Jane Jacobs was all of those and more. She died this morning in Toronto at age 89. The world – or at least this part of it – is better for her life and poorer for her death.

Born in Pennsylvania and later a resident of New York City, Jacobs moved to Toronto in the late 60s with her family in order to avoid her sons being drafted into the Viet Nam war. She said later that she’d fallen out of love with her country. However, while living in New York, she successfully stopped the construction of a neighborhood-damaging expressway, and she repeated that activism in Toronto as one of the leaders of the movement to stop the construction of the Spadina Expressway, which would have destroyed wide swaths of old neighborhoods in the downtown part of the city, where she lived until she died. Her first book, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, published in 1961, was a bible for urban organizers, favoring the small scale of low-rise local neighborhoods, which include both commercial and residential activity. Neither right wing nor left wing in her “small-p” politics, she favored grassroots action over big government.

She also, like me, scorned many “isms” and was, I think, anti-expert, saying more than once that ideologies are blinders. She was a magnificently successful example of passion and intellectual curiosity being the road to self-education. Beyond a few courses at Columbia University, she was self-taught and reportedly turned down many of the honorary degrees that were offered to her late in life. David Crombie, a former may or of Toronto and a long-time friend and admirer, has described her as a “Harvard refusenik.”

A friend of unschooling proponent John Holt, Jane attended and spoke at a memorial service that some of us organized for him in Toronto in 1985. Like Holt, she was an authentic thinker who avoided jargon and questioned received ideas that were presented as fact. She had a great and creative life, one that mattered in very many ways. And besides her books and the non-existent freeways, she has left a huge legacy of ideas. In 1997, the City of Toronto sponsored a conference entitled “Jane Jacobs: Ideas That Matter.”. One of the results of the conference was The Jane Jacobs Prize. It includes an annual stipend of $5,000 for three years to be given to “celebrate Toronto’s original, unsung heroes – by seeking out citizens who are engaged in activities that contribute to the city’s vitality.” Upon announcing her death today, her family issued a statement that read in part: “What’s important is not that she died but that she lived, and that her life’s work has greatly influenced the way we think. Please remember her by reading her books and implementing her ideas.” And, I would add, by replicating her ever-questioning, independent way of thinking about the world.
Posted: 2006/04/25 8:08 PM

Trusting Ourselves and Our Children Is Not Regressive – April 1, 2005
Life learning families make choices that differ in some ways from current societal norms, and therefore sometimes struggle with the tensions and seeming contradictions inherent in those choices. Giving our children the honor of learning without schooling is bound to bump up against many other issues, from how a family makes its living to how the chores get done.

I have been exploring some of those issues – both in my own life and in a broader context – as a result of the reader feedback I’ve been receiving to a recent Life Learning magazine column (see my March 21, 2005 blog entry – “Learning Neatness”). As part of that exploration, I am reading a book entitled The Paradox of Natural Mothering (2002, Temple University Press). Academic Chris Bobel has massaged her dissertation into a book that portrays a group of mothers engaged in homeschooling, natural health care, voluntary simplicity and various attachment parenting practices. The paradox in the title arises from what Bobel sees as a conflict between a lifestyle that is both progressive and regressive (i.e. anti-feminist). While the women she interviewed feel they are making choices in their lives, Bobel denigrates these as non-choices that are biologically determined because they are emotionally-based rather than intellectually thought-out. (Presumably, if they’d thought about their choices, they’d have behaved like more conventional mothers!) What these mothers are, in fact, doing is trusting their emotions, their intuition, their bodies and their children.

Perhaps our societal agendas have swung us so far away from the inherent “knowing” that characterizes primitive societies that so-called “natural parenting” seems to contradict the principles of equality for women. My own life – and I would say those of the women Bobel has portrayed – is an ongoing pursuit of the balance between trust and intellect. Trust, after all, is one of the cornerstones of non-coercive parenting and life learning. Taking ownership of our own education and allowing our children to own theirs requires trust in what we call “human nature”. In the case of our children, that means trusting that they will behave sociably and want to learn things, including both academic knowledge and social skills...with our help and example, of course.
Posted: 2005/04/01 12:10 PM

Learning in Nature – February 16, 2005
I’m reading an advance proof of a book slated entitled Last Child in the Woods – Saving Our Children From Nature-Deficit Disorder. The author is journalist Richard Louv and the book  is scheduled for May publication by Algonquin Books. While I dislike the idea of labeling kids as having “disorders”, Louv uses the term as an apt description for a worrisome phenomenon. His premise is that for the first time in history, our children’s direct experience in Nature is disappearing – with disastrous results for the future of our children and the future of our planet. I will likely choose a piece from it for excerption in Natural Life magazine. But for now, it has reminded me of my own early direct experience in Nature, in a tiny corner of the inner city neighborhood where I grew up.

There was a piece at the back of our backyard that was bordered on one side by the green wooden wall of a ramshackle garage and on the opposite side and back by a high (or so it seemed to me at the time) unpainted wooden fence. Dense foliage from a big, old elm tree located just beyond the fence in the neighbor’s yard created a summertime roof. It also meant that the corner was dark and a bit damp, making it useless for growing grass, roses or petunias, which constituted my parents’ definition of gardening. So they dumped grass and hedge clippings there, along with end-of-season annuals, dead roses and petunias. There were also a couple of fairly large rocks.

Going there was forbidden due to mosquitoes, thorns and lots of other potential dangers...and some imagined ones too. When I was young, I obeyed the rule. I am not sure whether the hype convinced me of the danger or I just hadn’t learned to question authority. But I remember standing on the grass looking longingly – or perhaps just curiously – into its shady depths and inhaling the dank smell of composting greenery.

I also remember the day when I ventured in and sat down on one of the rocks. It felt wonderful. That feeling was, I suppose, a combination of rebellious adrenaline and enjoyment of the space. It seemed protected and cozy, yet retained a hint of danger due to its “wildness” and forbidden status. Having crossed the barrier, I subsequently went there often on hot summer days, taking a book and my day dreams. Sometimes my feelings of anger or frustration also accompanied me, to be left buried under the decaying grass. It was a deliciously private place, and a healing one too. Eventually, as I got too big to sit comfortably on the rock, I dragged a lawn chair there. But I never felt that the chair belonged; it was too much civilization in my wilderness. My mother must have noticed the chair but, oddly, I don’t recall if she put an end to my visits or not. Perhaps I outgrew that private place, replacing solitude with boys and broader horizons. But as my first taste of Nature amid asphalt and stucco, it was the beginning of a life-long reverence for that which is wild, green and living...and of an understanding of the healing powers of Nature.
Posted: 2005/02/16 11:57 AM

Thinking Big – November 4, 2004
One of the things about being an editor is that I receive lots of books in the mail. These review copies are both a joy and a problem (what to do with all the books and when to read them?). I try at least to glance at all those which appear to be relevant to my work. And last night I dipped into a small paperback with the simple name Anyway (2004, Berkley Books) because its subtitle included the words “Finding Personal Meaning in a Crazy World”. This week I’ve been thinking that the world is a bit crazier than usual.

Author Kent M. Keith has reclaimed some writing he’d done in university that had taken on a life of its own via the Internet. His ten “Paradoxical Commandments” are thoughts like: “Honesty and frankness make you vulnerable. Be honest and frank anyway.” and “The biggest men and women with the biggest ideas can be shot down by the smallest men and women with the smallest minds. Think big anyway.” and “People are illogical, unreasonable, and self-centered. Love them anyway.”

Most of us have self-centered or even narcissistic people in our lives and probably find it a challenge to love them anyway. These folks – Keith calls them “small people” – see things solely in terms of their own power, comfort or convenience. Now, a little self-interest is a good thing, and some people – women who grew up a generation ago, especially – struggle with the problem of being self-sacrificing to a fault. But “small people” believe that what is best for them is also best for their families, organizations or communities. In other words, their lives are no bigger than their immediate wants, needs and fears and they are often threatened by big ideas.

The founding fathers of the United States had a big idea for a democratic country populated with independent individuals. Susan B. Anthony and Martin Luther King Jr. had big ideas about the equality of women and blacks. I hope that fear hasn’t permanently sidelined or skewed those big ideas in America. In a globalized world, the lives of Americans are, indeed, much bigger than their immediate wants, needs and fears. Another great American, Henry David Thoreau, asked a pertinent question: “Could a greater miracle take place than for us to look through each other’s eyes for an instant?” Good advice for both those Americans who are happy with the results of the U.S. presidential election and those in America and the rest of the world who aren’t.
Posted: 2004/11/04 11:17 AM

Or Are They Growing Up Too Slowly? – August 9, 2004
Many of us know 20-somethings who are returning home to live with their parents...or we know (or are) the parents. An article in the July/August of Utne magazine calls these young people “adultescents” and quotes a year-old article in Psychology Today that blames the phenomenon on Baby Boomer parents who don’t want their adult children to grow up. These “permaparents” are supposedly impeding their adult offspring’s independence as a selfish extension of their manic parenting style. And yup, there are books on the topic too, such as All Grown Up: Living Happily Ever After with Your Adult Children by Roberta Maisel.

So which trend is it anyway?? Parents rushing their kids into adulthood before they’re ready (see yesterday’s rant, below) or parents not allowing them to grow up? Can’t be both at the same time. 

Let’s just listen to our kids and our hearts; ignore the trends, the fads and...this is heresy coming from a writer...the books; respect our kids for the individuals they are; stop beating ourselves up for not being perfect parents; and enjoy ourselves and our families. Now there’s a concept!
Posted: 2004/08/09 5:58 PM

At Their Own Speed – August 8, 2004
Yesterday, our youngest daughter left for her 2000 km-away home after a two-week visit. As always when a visit with one of our daughters ends, I have been thinking about their childhoods. By all accounts, those years, when they learned without school and we traveled often and far, were fun and carefree. They learned easily and joyfully, were stable and responsible children, and grew at their own comfortable speed into successful, happy adults. Watching them grow up reinforced my belief that our society expects too little of children, refusing to respect their rights and neglecting to listen to their opinions.

But chatting with our daughter this past week, some concerns that have been lurking just under my consciousness began to surface. I began to wonder if their father and I could have done better (don’t we all?!) especially in terms of helping them make the transition to adulthood. Did they really grow up at their own speed, or did we expect too much from them too soon because – like most alternatively-educated and attachment-parented kids – they seemed sophisticated and confident at a relatively early age?

In his book The Hurried Child, David Elkind writes that in blurring the boundaries of what is age appropriate, by expecting or imposing too much too soon, we force our kids to grow up too fast. But what, I argued with myself this morning, is “age appropriate”? And who decides?

Elkind’s basic premise is that parents have pushed their children emotionally and intellectually too far, too fast. He says that today’s parents think of their kids as Superkids, so competent and so mature that they need adults very little. Why? Because, he believes, parents, who are building careers, blending families or struggling as single parents, have no time for child rearing. Having a competent Superkid relieves these parents of guilt, but it places too much stress on the children themselves.

British psychologist Terri Apter takes Elkind’s premise a step farther. In her book The Myth of Maturity, she argues against the notion that when children finish high school or college and land a job they instantly become autonomous, responsible adults. This myth of maturity, she writes, is harming our kids. While a young person may appear to function as an adult, in reality they are often in turmoil, depressed and overwhelmed by life. So instead of withdrawing emotional or practical support so that their teenager can solve his or her own problems, Apter says we really should be providing continued guidance and support, while also requiring respect and independence.

Looking back, I do recall feeling relieved (OK, smug too) that my kids seemed to be navigating teenagedom fairly easily. However, listening to them now, I realize that we probably sometimes fell off the fine line between expecting too much and too little. And while never withdrawing emotional support, their father did give them some not-so-subtle nudges out of the nest. But we didn’t feel any pressure to go along with the Superkid image out of fear that Heidi and Melanie would “lag behind”. And as autonomous, responsible children and teens, they naturally avoided the jolt that happens to the schooled kids Apter studied. And even though – for whatever reasons – I missed some things with which I probably could have helped, they grew quite gracefully into their 20s and now their 30s.

Then, just as I had laid that concern to rest, I went shopping and noticed a plethora of adult-aimed items – from T-shirts and purses to tea towels – featuring Care Bears, Hello Kitty, Blues Cues and various Disney characters. Are young people, I wondered, feeling so cheated out of childhood that they have this level of nostalgia for novelties geared to a much younger audience? Are they revisiting the fantasy world of childhood because the real world is so scary, as an article in yesterday’s Toronto Star (one of a recent spate in the mainstream media) suggests? Writes columnist Margo Varadi, “There comes a point when young people can’t deal with the anxiety of feeling vulnerable all the time and want to be reassured.” Hmmm, I thought, as I read that line. There comes a point when people of all ages can’t deal with the anxiety of feeling vulnerable and want to be reassured! Maybe we all need a dose of childhood from time to time just because it’s comforting. Maybe nostalgia thrives as the world gets scarier.
Posted: 2004/08/08 12:02 PM

Lack of Power – April 21, 2004
Murray Milner Jr., a sociologist at the University of Virginia, says that the baffling social behavior of so many of today's teenagers is a reaction to the isolated and powerless role that adults have assigned to them. Milner is the author of a new book Freaks, Geeks, and Cool Kids: American Teenagers, Schools, and the Culture of Consumption (Routledge, 2004). Through extensive fieldwork by a team of researchers, he found that the elaborate social scenes constructed by teenagers are a logical response to the constraints of their lives. He says that living in a world ruled and regulated by adults, teenagers have few opportunities to shape the key features of their lives. And so they exert control over their school social scene – with a vengeance. “Why this near obsession with status? It is because they have so little real economic or political power. They must attend school for most of the day and they have only very limited influence on what happens there.... They do, however, have one crucial kind of power: the power to create an informal social world in which they evaluate one another.” 

Milner’s findings also suggest that our consumer society plays an influential role in the lives of status-conscious teenagers: “Perhaps the thing that American secondary education teaches most effectively is a desire to consume,” he writes.
Posted: 4/21/2004 10:24 AM

Learning and Forgetting – April 19, 2004
I’ve been reading a wonderful little book by Frank Smith, entitled The Book of Learning and Forgetting (Teachers College Press, 1998), which, by the way, is reviewed in the upcoming May/June issue of Life Learning. Smith, who was a reporter, editor and novelist before beginning his formal research into language, thinking and learning as a Harvard Ph.D. and subsequent education professor in Canada and South Africa, has a knack for cogent description of what helps and hinders learning. He believes that learning is a social process that can occur for people of all ages naturally and continually through collaborative activities (no news to most of the people reading this blog!).

In this book, which is one of many he has written, Smith writes at length about short- and long-term memory. He explains that the effort to memorize interferes with memorization because it destroys understanding. Rote memorization, he says, puts things in the wrong place (i.e. in short-term memory, where you can only hold onto something for as long as you rehearse it). When something goes into long-term memory, on the other hand, information is organized and retrieved on the basis of the sense they make to us. The way to hold something in long-term memory is – as anyone knows who has tried to remember a new acquaintance’s name at a cocktail party – to relate it to something you already know. But, writes Smith, when you are trying to learn something there is no need to worry about finding something you can relate the new knowledge to, “because that will take place automatically if you understand what you are doing.” So, he recommends, don’t even think about it. “Get on with enjoying what you are reading – or look around for something else that is [more]  interesting and does makes sense to you.” In short, the more absorbed we are in an activity, the more we learn about it.
Posted: 4/19/2004 10:41 AM

Teenage Lib Handbook Author Featured – April 12, 2004
Grace Llewellyn, author of the Teenage Liberation Handbook and founder of the Not Back to School Camp, is featured in an in-depth profile in the current issue of Teacher Magazine. It is an interesting read. As Grace told writer Tracy Aitken in a shorter interview in the current issue of Life Learning, the underground unschooling classic was not originally intended for homeschoolers, but to “open up the world if independent, self-directed learning for school kids”. And she now seems to be moving on from supporting unschoolers. Her next book is aimed at supporting teens “who would not or could not leave school”. She is collecting info for that project and can find a survey to that end on her website.
Posted: 4/12/2004 3:28 PM

Radical Holt Book Back in Print – April 4, 2004
Kudos to Sentient Publications for reviving – intact – what I think is John Holt’s best book, Instead of Education – Ways to Help People do Things Better. Holt, of course, believed in learning by doing and coined the term “unschooling”. But in addition to being an educational reformer, he was also a social reformer. And this book, while not as well known as How Children Learn, How Children Fail, and Teach Your Own, may be his most radical. Originally published in 1976, Instead of Education lays the framework for unschooling as the path to self-directed learning and a creative life. It is both an indictment of state-run schools (what he calls “S-chools”) and a description of a variety of learning opportunities outside of conventional schools, including personal learning schedules, independent study programs, community learning exchanges and co-ops, and resources like museums and libraries. But more radically, it includes strategies for helping kids escape compulsory schooling, both legally and in defiance of truancy laws – including the creation of an “underground railroad” for school leavers. While the homeschooling movement has matured in 30 years, unfortunately, Holt’s indictment of S-chools rings as true as ever. 
Posted: 4/4/2004  5:26 PM