|
A
Plenitude of Work – January 2, 2011
Although it was coined over ten years ago by home educating dad Michael Fogler
with the publication of his book
Un-Jobbing: The Adult Liberation Handbook, the term “unjobbing” has been
getting some new attention recently.
And the other day, someone commented to me that unjobbing
seems to be a self-absorbed luxury. I countered that a variety of motivations
are at play, many not about luxury at all. Baby boomers are getting to
retirement age and wanting to continue to work as a way of staying “young.”
Other people are still jobless due to the recession and are looking for creative
ways to pay the rent. Those with jobs find themselves working harder for less
buying power. Some people worry that more economic hard times are ahead and want
to be prepared by developing greater self-reliance. Still others are just plain
burnt out and fed up, wondering if there’s more to life than the nine-to-five
grind and are willing to trade some purchasing power and stress for a simpler
and healthier lifestyle. And then there are the parents who want to stay at home
with their children or elderly parents.
Fogler identified the common ground among all these people
when he wrote, “What we have going with our jobbing orientation is chronic
national busy-ness (alias ‘business’), which has proven itself to be unhealthful
for humans and our planetary home. We must look in another direction. We must
put less emphasis on jobs and more on cooperation, simplicity, and serving one
another. This may very well involve meaningful work, but that’s not the same as
jobs.”
There are many useless, mindless, nasty, unhealthy, soul-
and planet-destroying jobs out there, which need to be eliminated one way or
another. Meanwhile, we can follow the Buddhist path that says even the humblest
job can have meaning. Vietnamese Zen teacher Thich Nhat Hanh wrote, “To practice
Right Livelihood, you have to find a way to earn your living without
transgressing your ideals of love and compassion. The way you support yourself
can be an expression of your deepest self, or it can be a source of suffering
for you and others ... Our vocation can nourish our understanding and
compassion, or erode them. We should be awake to the consequences, far and near,
of the way we earn our living.” (The Heart of the Buddha’s Teaching, Parallax
Press, 1998).
In a recent letter to the editor published in
The Progressive, author and
philosopher Wendell Berry took that a bit farther by addressing the issue of
work’s quantity and quality. He said that we need to ask a variety of questions
about work before – as do some unjobbers – we suggest people are doing too much
of it. Questions like whether or not we chose our work or feel compelled to do
it to earn money; about how much of our intelligence, skill and pride is
involved in our work; if we respect the result of our work; and what are the
ecological and social costs of our work.
However, although there is much important work to be done
that has positive ecological and social benefits, there is not enough
willingness to pay for it. And expressing one’s deepest self or even worrying
about the consequences of one’s work is difficult when struggling to pay the
rent. That, I guess, is where simplifying comes in, and having some
self-sufficiency skills.
Rolf and I are fortunate to have found right livelihood, we
can manage to pay our bills, and our work is often our play, even though the
hours are long. That, I think, is the essence of unjobbing, no matter what the
original motivation.
Posted: 2011/01/02 8:56 PM
|