Challenging Assumptions blog by Wendy Priesnitz

Wendy on first day of school

Editor-in-Chief of
Life Learning magazine

Editor-in-Chief of 
Natural Life magazine

Editor-in-Chief of
Natural Child magazine

Author of unschooling books

Small/Home Business writer

Poet

Speaker

Interview on Radio Free School


Natural Child magazine

Natural Life magazine

Life Learning Magazine

Challenging Assumptions in Education by Wendy Priesnitz

Bringing it Home - A Home Business Guide by Wendy Priesnitz

School Free - The Homeschooling Handbook by Wendy Priesnitz

Musings, meanderings, wonderings and wanderings about unschooling, natural  parenting, sustainable living and more by Wendy Priesnitz. 

Archives - September, 2007

Citizen Scientist Programs Threatened – September 25, 2007  
What can one say about a government that professes to care about the issue Canadians care about the most – climate change – and yet continually erodes the programs and policies and agreements that are designed to do something about it…even ones that mostly involve community volunteers and young kids? One could call them stupid, arrogant, two-faced, deserving to be soundly defeated in the next election (which I hope they will be arrogant enough to engineer shortly).

The latest piece of evidence that the Canadian government doesn’t take global warming seriously is last week’s 80 percent slashing of the budget of Environment Canada’s Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network (EMAN). It is a partnership of over 600 organizations (international, national, provincial, territorial, other federal government departments, universities, intergovernmental organizations, NGOs, aboriginal groups, community groups) and individuals who undertake ecological monitoring in Canada. These groups, in turn, encourage local schools, community groups, individuals, naturalists, backyard enthusiasts, Scouts and Guides to act as “citizen scientists”, monitoring soil, air, water, wildflowers, frogs, ice and worms in order to track the influence of climate change. The information they collect is then analyzed by EMAN scientists. (Full disclosure: My youngest daughter Melanie is the very passionate Nova Scotia coordinator of PlantWatch, as part of her job as conservation horticulturalist at the Harriet Irving Botanical Gardens at Acadia University; the funding cuts won’t affect her regular job and she didn’t ask me to write this.) We published an article describing these programs in Natural Life magazine’s May/June, 2005 issue.

Actually, this is just one of many slashes, worth $10 million, that have happened to Environment Canada’s budget over the past year. Since the Conservative minority government announced just last month that the budget surplus for the 2007-08 fiscal year will come in higher than the $3-billion projection made in the federal budget earlier this year, lack of funds cannot be the reason for these cuts. Since these programs deal with climate change, the government explanation that the money is being redirected to climate change programs cannot be true. If this was a bloated initiative full of corporate executives billing gigantic fees, rather than a small staff doing wonders on a miniscule budget and working with hundreds of volunteers, cutting it might make sense. In fact, this was a very small investment for a huge return, providing access to a large amount of timely data at minimal expense. Oh, and there’s the educational value for all those citizen scientists.

Perhaps Halifax Liberal MP Geoff Regan has a better explanation for the cuts. He is vice-chairman of the House of Commons standing committee on the environment and sustainable development, and in a news release calling on the government to reinstate the funding, he said, “Perhaps the Conservative government feels that by eliminating the science, it can somehow erase the issue of global warming and climate change from the minds of Canadians.”

If that is the aim, it won’t work. Public awareness of climate change is here to stay. I hope that the thousands of volunteers involved in the programs run by the EMAN coordinating office will tell Environment Minister John Baird (by email or mail: Les Terrasses de la Chaudière, 10 Wellington Street, 28th Floor, Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0H3) about the importance of those monitoring programs...and tell him that cutting them is not in the government’s nor the public interest. If you care about wildflowers, frogs, migratory birds and our climate, send Baird a message. And encourage your Scout Troop, workplace, non-governmental organization, etc. also to write to him. You can copy the EMAN coordinating office.
Posted: 2007/09/25 7:25 PM

Breastfeeding is Not Obscene – for the gazillionth time! – September 12, 2007  
I’ve been crazy busy recently getting the November/December issues of Natural Life and Life Learning ready for the printer and gestating our third magazine baby Natural Child Magazine. So even though my brain and my in-box are brimming with juicy stuff to rant about, I’ve just not found the time. (I’m also gearing up to take a few days off while our youngest daughter visits this weekend.) However, an article in today’s newspaper has skyrocketed blogging to the top of my to-do list. In case you live in one of the apparently two places on the planet that haven’t had coverage of the latest breastfeeding-is-obscene flap, Facebook has messed up big time. It deleted pictures of nursing babies that it considered obscene content and closed the account of a woman in Edmonton. The grapevine went into overdrive and a new Facebook group set up to petition for a change in site policy – called “Hey Facebook, breastfeeding is not obscene!” if you are a Facebook user and want to sign up – has grown faster than a gestating magazine. This, of course, is just one of many instances of stupidity about breastfeeding. Awhile back, MySpace removed photos of a Tacoma, Washington woman breastfeeding her baby. And in 2004, a U.S. natural food store refused to sell an issue of Mothering with a breastfeeding mother on the cover.

As I wrote earlier this year, there is no excuse for this Neanderthal behavior in 2007. It is jaw-droppingly astonishing that some people don’t understand that feeding children is the purpose of breasts…and it’s a very sad commentary on our messed up culture that we connect feeding a child with sex and relegate it the bedroom, or with other bodily functions and banish it to the bathroom…or remove photos of it from the Internet because it is obscene. Shame on Facebook. Makes me want to boycott them. We’re compiling a list of baby- and breastfeeding-friendly alternatives for posting on the Natural Child Magazine website. Please send me your favorites.
Posted: 2007/09/12 4:12 PM

Telling Us What We Already Know...Don’t We? – September 6, 2007
I can’t decide whether I should feel smug, confused, angry or just cynical. Today, a study published in The Lancet medical journal stated the obvious: Food additives fuel hyperactivity. In fact, preservatives and artificial colors have “significantly adverse” effects, British scientists have found. Um, I thought Dr. Benjamin Feingold figured this out over three decades ago. Isn’t that why we monitored our daughters’ consumption of things like Red Dye #3 and Yellow #2 in the 1970s? Or maybe Red Dye #3 – which was banned in the U.S. in 1990 – just caused cancer. Silly me.

And yet, a professor of psychology at the University Southampton was quoted in the press as saying that we now, for the first time, have clear evidence that mixtures of certain common food colors and preservatives (namely sodium benzoate) can adversely influence the behavior of children. Of course, the same guy noted, simply removing the additives from food would not prevent hyperactivity in children. Of course not.

So does this mean that industry-sponsored scientists will now suddenly agree with independent researchers about something that has long been obvious to observant mothers? Don’t hold your breath. The new research was apparently greeted with skepticism by the International Food Additives Council, an Atlanta-based trade association.
Posted: 2007/09/06 8:40 PM

Healing the Ugliness of a Schooled Society – September 5, 2007
Anyone who has chosen the unschooling path for themselves or their children has already decided that school is not usually the best environment for getting an education. Although I like to focus on the positive, sometimes it’s necessary to explore the negative aspects of schooling in order to envision a broadly-based education system that has moved beyond the school model. That’s what I did in my book Challenging Assumptions in Education, which will soon be going into its fifth printing. And this week, when most kids are trudging back to school, seems like a good time to do that.

Any exploration of this sort inevitably pokes around at the true meaning of education, both for individuals and for society. And that’s the focus of a number of the articles and columns in the September/October issue of Life Learning, now on its way to subscribers.

Gea Bassett – a 29-year-old unschooled mother of a young child – describes how the time and space she was given as a child became the path to self-reliant, open-ended thinking. And, she reasons, that sort of thinking is the key to fixing this broken old world’s social and environmental perspectives. Dan Grego – director of a community organization that helps at-risk youth become productive adults and responsible community members – comes at the problem from a different perspective but ends up at the same place. Recognizing that learning isn’t something one switches on and off at certain times or in certain locations, he suggests that all schools be closed, at least temporarily. Then, he says, “Without the crutch of the schools to lean on, everyone in a community would have to reclaim his or her own responsibility for educating the young.”

Homeschooling author and speaker David Albert makes some suggestions about how families can do that in the column he writes with Joyce Reed. Along the way, he describes the soul-destroyingly ugliness of the schooling experience. He also describes the alternative, which, of course, is based on our trust in children. David writes, “Our children have within themselves, or so I am led to believe by my experience of them, an inner yearning for the beautiful, a potential wonderment and a delicious longing and love and trembling waiting to be empowered on its quest.” 

David and Dan Grego agree that this yearning is not likely to be fulfilled in a school or a shopping mall, that we can’t buy our way to a healthier, saner world; nor can we school our way to it. But we can get there by creating the environment where happy, self-reliant, fully engaged, truly well educated children can develop the ability to heal the problems that previous generations of schooled adults have created. I hope these three ways of making the same point encourage you to believe in the beauty of the unschooling path.
Posted: 2007/09/05 9:15 AM

Learning from the Learners – September 2, 2007
The month I graduated from teachers’ college – June, 1969 – Herbert Kohl’s book The Open Classroom (Random House, 1969) was published. I read it that summer and perhaps it contributed to the frustration I felt in my first (and last) few months as a classroom teacher. In the book, Kohl advocates an organic, realistic and less patriarchal approach to being a teacher in a public school – something that I wasn’t able to envision, let alone implement, so I resigned, never to teach school again. And the rest of my educational advocacy career is, as they say, history. Kohl’s output now numbers more than 40 books, including I Won’t Learn From You (Milkweed Editions, 1991), in which he suggests that learning not to learn is a difficult, intellectual activity that is a manifestation of resistance to oppression and a sign of a survivor in a hostile environment.

I’ve just finished his latest book, a memoir called Painting Chinese: A Lifelong Teacher Gains the Wisdom of Youth (Bloomsbury, 2007). Honestly and humbly, Kohl describes how, late in a productive life and searching for something new to engage in, he stumbled into a Chinese painting class…where his fellow students were all young Chinese children. He writes about studying alongside the children while reflecting on his life. Painting took on a meditative quality and helped him come to terms with waning energy and the cancellation of a beloved university program. But more importantly to me, the supportive environment and hands-on, noncompetitive learning process he experienced in the painting classes led him to articulate things he’s danced around in his long career as writer, educator and social justice advocate. Kohl’s body of work is focused on helping teachers fit the square peg of unstructured creative learning into the round hole of school environments. Learning with children rather than teaching them has given him a seemingly new perspective. “Children,” he writes, “when unencumbered by adult demands and channeling educational structures, are extraordinary watchers and learn through what they see and experience.”
Posted: 2007/09/02 12:58 PM

Return to current weblog
Comments? Suggestions? Email Us

copyright © Wendy Priesnitz 2007

Topics & Passions:

natural learning
simplicity
environment
parenting
creativity / writing
books

~

What I'm Reading:

Absolute Trust in the Goodness of the Earth - New Poems by Alice Walker (Random House, 2003)
Painting Chinese: A Lifelong Teacher Gains the Wisdom of Youth
by Herbert Kohl (Bloomsbury, 2007)
Animal, Vegetable, Miracle - A Year of Food Life
by Barbara Kingsolver (HarperCollins, 2007)
Blessed Unrest
by Paul Hawken (Viking, 2007)

~

What I'm Listening To: 

The Living Room Tour by Carole King (Rockingale Records, 2005)
Fresh Air
by Mary Kastle (Demo EP, 2006, marykastle.com)
Solo Piano - Ten Performances
(Fringe Jazz Toronto, 2004)

~

Fav Bookmarks:

Daughter Blog
Junkyard Sports
Radio Free School
Parenting Without Punishing
The Guardian
Organic Consumers Association
Free2be
Common Dreams
Grist Magazine

~

Fav Quotes:

Art, Writing, Creativity
Life and Living
Men and Women
Learning
Environment and Peace