Editor of
Life Learning magazine

Editor of 
Natural Life magazine

Author of unschooling books

Small/Home Business writer

Poet

Speaker

Interview on Radio Free School

 

 

 

 

Musings, meanderings, wonderings and wanderings about unschooling, natural  parenting, sustainable living and more by Wendy Priesnitz. 

Archives - March, 2007

Treating the Symptoms and Not the Problems – March 26, 2007
Today, the Learning Disabilities Association of Canada is releasing a new study on the societal costs of learning disabilities in Canada. Putting a Canadian Face on Learning Disabilities took three years and $300,000 of federal government funding to develop. The study examined 20 years of Statistics Canada reports looking at key areas of a person’s life, including education, employment, social relationships, family, health and finance to develop indicators of how a so-called “learning disabled” person compares with the general population. And, not surprisingly, they lag behind in most of those areas. Learning disabilities were defined as any one of a number of “disorders” from dyslexia and dysgraphia (writing) to dyscalculia (mathematics). The solutions suggested by the authors include a broader societal approach to dealing with learning disabilities, including mandatory early screening for children aged four to eight, publicly funded support through provincial health insurance plans, more awareness and training among medical, mental health and educational professionals and raising awareness of employers to offering accommodations to their workers.

Two things trouble me about this report. First of all, the underlying assumption is that school is the best and perhaps only method of education and that anyone who cannot learn in that environment has a problem. I can’t describe how angry I am at the idea of mandatory screening of children to find “symptoms” of a “disorder” that doesn’t need to exist! Who is spending $300,000 worth of taxpayers’ money to figure out how to dismantle our archaic school system and replace it with a community-based, learner-directed one where children are free to learn naturally…and that doesn’t victimize, medicalize and stigmatize its unsuccessful clients? Unfortunately, we are apparently going in the opposite direction. An article in today’s Toronto Star about the report quotes its co-author Alexander Wilson of Mount Allison University as saying, “We have to get away from thinking of this as an education problem. We need to make a systemic change and look at this across a person’s lifespan and involve more agencies in their care and support.”

And that leads to my second concern. The study found that about 40 per cent of children who were identified with learning disabilities at age seven were prone to ear infections and allergies at age three. Since, according to the study, up to 85 percent of those labeled as having a learning disability also have a reading disability (not sure how they differ), there is a need for early learning disability screening, presumably so that children can learn to read better. Here, once again is a confusion between symptom and problem. Of course, someone who doesn’t feel well will have trouble functioning, especially in a structured, noisy environment like school. But ear infections and allergies aren’t normal. In fact, like many so-called learning and behavioral “problems” experienced by children in school, they often are associated with diets full of chemicals and processed foods, and with nutritional deficiencies or weakened immune systems.

Conventional medicine treats ear infections with antibiotics rather than addressing the underlying causes of the problem; this report wants to “treat” children who don’t learn well in school in the same manner, rather than questioning our assumptions about education and health. The way to really help stem the mushrooming “problem” of people with “learning disabilities” is to admit that our factory model of education doesn’t work anymore and needs a major demolition and reconstruction. Maybe we need to get rid of junk food first, so that we all think straighter!
Posted: 2007/03/26 12:31 PM 

Liberating Education – March 18, 2007
Thanks to a reader for sending me the link to this opinion piece that he recently read in the Times of India while on a flight in that country. (Alert: if you open the link, you’ll get lots of ads popping up in addition to the newspaper’s site.) It’s really quite an remarkable article, especially given the formality of formal education in India. The writer, a college professor, clearly understands the difference between being taught and learning. The piece begins, “When learning is eventually liberated from institutionalized teaching, people will wonder how a system as inefficient as the current education system lasted so long.” It argues for a more open, learner-directed style of education, noting that, “It is decided for them by the system what they will learn, from whom they must learn and in how much time they must learn it.” And, the article goes on to say, the system also dictates where students will learn what they’re told they should learn. The writer knows why, too: “This is because institutionalized teaching primarily exists to support itself, and to ensure its own continuance, authority and power. This overrides any thought of reforms.” Yup. Same in this part of the world. The writer also points out that most parents actually welcome this deprival of freedom for their children. Change happens slowly, but it happens.
Posted: 2007/03/18 4:38 PM 

Classifying and Dividing – March 17, 2007
I had forgotten how students are taught to write in college…until recently when I came head-to-head with a development English textbook that is used in college composition courses. Well, actually, it’s a textbook in preparation. And an article I wrote for Natural Life magazine a few years ago has been chosen to appear in the $60 book as an example of a rhetorical style called “Classification and Division.” Hmmm, sounds like math to me, not writing! And I’m not at all sure I’m flattered. Aside from the usual parsing of sentences, the book breaks the process of writing a paragraph into various topics like: “Time-Order or Process Development,” Comparison and Contrast Development,” “Definition Development” and, of course, “Classification and Division.” Presumably, the broken down bits comes back together at the end of the book and the student is able to write a coherent piece. I can only hope that they skip the details and just read the examples. Or skip the whole course, read a good book or ten, and write.
Posted: 2007/03/17 11:10 AM 

On the Assembly Line at Birth – March 14, 2007
There was an article in the Guardian newspaper yesterday about a new legally enforced national curriculum for children from birth to five. Every childcare provider other than parents (although one wonders if that will be the next step) in Britain will have to monitor babies’ progress towards a set of 69 government-set “early learning goals,” recording them against more than 500 developmental milestones. Apparently, it’s in place so that when children enter school, they are able to read (using a phonics approach,) count to ten and sing simple songs from memory. According to the Guardian, babies up to 11 months of age should “play with their own fingers and toes and focus on objects around them” and “communicate in a variety of ways including crying, gurgling, babbling and screaming.”

I don’t know about babies, but when I read about this outrageously misguided compulsory regimentation, I cried, gurgled, babbled and screamed. I hope that saner heads will prevail and understand that this is exactly the opposite of what is needed to nurture the sort of critically thinking, creative people society needs. And if saner heads do not prevail, I hope that the UK authorities are prepared for the inevitable increase in the number of unschoolers.
Posted: 2007/03/14 11:25 AM 

We’ve Come a Long Way – March 8, 2007
1975 was a good year. My lovely and lively daughters were two and three, and I was beginning to find my voice as a writer, something I’d always had a hard time taking seriously. I shared my fears, frustrations and joys with some women who met regularly for coffee. We called ourselves a “consciousness raising group” – a term I haven’t heard in years. That year was also designated as “International Women’s Year” by the United Nations, and I learned a great deal about the history of the women’s movement. I learned that a meeting in Copenhagen, Denmark in 1910 – the year after my mother was born! – had decided to create an International Women’s Day, which was celebrated on March 19 the following year in Denmark, Austria, Germany and Switzerland. I learned that the date was subsequently moved to March 8 in honor of a women’s peace strike in Russia, a fact that got me thinking outside my own boundaries towards what I could do to fix the world. For me, March 8 is now a day to think about, agitate for and celebrate issues that affect not only women but our families, the environment and the human condition in general. IWD is even an official holiday in some countries that were part of the former USSR, as well as Mongolia and Vietnam.

When my daughters were teenagers, I sensed that they felt that all the battles had been won for women and didn’t seem to understand the complexity of patriarchy and how much it is part of the fabric of society. Women are still not proportionately represented in politics and in many jobs. There are still grave problems globally in terms of women’s education, health and violence. And, as I’ve written about here and in other places, there are many differences and disagreements among women about what choice and equality really mean.

On the other hand, we have come a long way. Here in Canada, women officially became “persons” under the law the year my mother turned 20 (she says she did not notice...was probably having too much fun dancing!). And now, some countries have female leaders, women are pursuing higher education and non-traditional careers in unprecedented numbers, and we do have real choices. Today is a day to celebrate these choices as well as all women and our individual and collective achievements…so Happy International Women’s Day to us all.

I like to remember what  Judge Emily Murphy (one of the five women who fought for Canadian women to have legal status) wrote in 1931: “We want women leaders today as never before. Leaders who are not afraid to be called names and who are willing to go out and fight. I think women can save civilization. Women are persons.”
Posted: 2007/03/08 10:04 AM 

Freedom to Read – March 1, 2007
This is Freedom to Read Week in Canada. A project of the Book and Periodical Council, this is an annual event that encourages Canadians to think about and reaffirm their commitment to intellectual freedom, which is guaranteed under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In spite of the fact that Canada prides itself on being a free country, books and magazines are continually challenged and sometimes censored, mostly for use by children. The BPC maintains a list of such titles, along with the reasons for being challenged and any known outcomes of the challenges. (The American Library Association has a similar event each fall, called Banned Books Week.)

As part of the week’s festivities, the Writers’ Union of Canada has awarded its annual Freedom to Read Award to a child…for the first time ever. Evie Freedman won for what Union Chair Ron Brown calls her “impassioned defense” of the book Three Wishes when it was banned last year by the Toronto District School Board. Brown says, “Although many notable individuals defended the retention of the book in the schools, Ms. Freedman was best able to reflect the concerns of those most affected, the students themselves. She did so most ably in front of a large press conference as well as in a number of media interviews.” She was nine years old at the time.

Three Wishes, by Canadian author Deborah Ellis, is a compilation of the author’s interviews with Israeli and Palestinian children who expressed a wide range of hopes, fears and hatred on the conflict in their region. The Canadian Jewish Congress launched a campaign among school boards across Ontario to have the book withdrawn from the popular Silver Birch Awards competition. While only a handful of school boards agreed to do so, the Toronto board was the only one to remove it from the public schools entirely.

In media coverage when the book was banned, Evie was quoted as saying that adults were always underestimating what kids can understand and she was adamant she didn’t need anyone to tell her what she could read. At the same time, the books’s author Deborah Ellis said, “If children are tough enough to be bombed and starved, they’re tough enough to read about it.” Well said. And congratulations to Evie Freedman.
Posted: 2007/03/01 11:41 AM 

Return to current weblog
Comments? Suggestions? Email Us

copyright © Wendy Priesnitz 2007

Topics & Passions:

natural learning
simplicity
environment
parenting
creativity / writing
books

~

What I'm Reading:

Goddesses in Older Women - Archetypes in Women Over Fifty by Jean Shinoda Bolen (2001, HarperCollins)
Coming to Our Senses - Healing Ourselves and the World Through Mindfulness
by Jon Kabat-Zinn (Hyperion, 2005)
Moral Minds
by Marc D. Hauser (HarperCollins, 2006)

~

What I'm Listening To: 

The Band: The Last Waltz  (Warner Bros., 2003)
Bach Violin Concertos
by Itzhak Perlman and Pinchas Zukerman with the English Chamber Orchestra (EMI, 2001)
Solo Piano - Ten Performances
(Fringe Jazz Toronto, 2004)
Half the Perfect World
by Madeleine Peyroux (Rounder Records, 2006)

~

Fav Bookmarks:

Daughter Blog
Moon and Me - Bringing Nature and Nurture Together
Parenting Without Punishing
The Guardian
Organic Consumers Association
Free2be
Common Dreams
Grist Magazine

~

Fav Quotes:

Art, Writing, Creativity
Life and Living
Men and Women
Learning
Environment and Peace