Editor of
Life Learning
magazine

Editor of 
Natural Life
magazine

Author of
educational books

Small/
Home Business
writer

Poet

Speaker



 

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome to these regular musings, meanderings, wonderings and wanderings by Wendy Priesnitz.  

Archives - March, 2005

Doom-Mongering or Wake-Up Call? – March 31, 2005
A new United Nations report says we are using up our natural resources too fast and are in danger of destroying about two-thirds of the Earth’s ecosystems. It hasn’t taken long for the right wing think thanks, in their typical knee-jerk reaction fashion, to churn out press releases likening the UN to Chicken Little.

The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, released yesterday, warns that 15 of 24 global ecosystems are in decline and that the harmful consequences of this degradation could grow much worse in the next 50 years. Hardly a lightweight assessment, the 2,500-page UN report is a synthesis of the work of about 1,300 researchers from 95 countries. It is being hailed as the most comprehensive survey ever into the natural systems that sustain life on Earth. UN Undersecretary Hans van Ginkel says the assessment reveals a consensus among the world’s social and natural scientists.

Dr. Walter Reid, one of the report’s authors told reporters yesterday, “Clearly, the dual trends of continuing degradation of most ecosystem services and continuing growth in demand for these same services cannot continue...The assessment shows that over the next 50 years, the risk is not of some global environmental collapse, but rather a risk of many local and regional collapses in particular ecosystem services. We already see those collapses occurring – fisheries stocks collapsing, dead zones in the sea, land degradation undermining crop production, species extinctions.”

Nevertheless, the Washington-based Competitive Enterprise Institute – which describes itself as being “dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government” – calls the report “Malthusian alarmism”. Claims CEI Senior Fellow Iain Murray in a written statement, “They’re at it again. This is simply the latest in a series of doom-mongering underestimates of resources coupled with a stubborn refusal to recognize the role of human ingenuity in solving such problems. The public has grown tired of these Malthusian malcontents constantly crying wolf, which is probably why the public no longer ranks the environment in the top ten issues it is concerned about.”

CEI founder Fred L. Smith, Jr. once worked as a policy analyst at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, so he should know better. Or maybe that’s why he doesn’t. As the report clearly laid out, ignoring those warning signs because they might harm the economy won’t make them go away…but it will surely damage the very economy the CEI so worries about.
Posted: 2005/03/31 12:04 PM

Learning Neatness – March 21, 2005
I get a lot of feedback from Life Learning readers. And I love it, whether it’s praising or criticizing, because one of my goals for magazine editing is to challenge, provoke and get readers to think. And feedback means people are engaged with the magazine and care enough to share their opinions. However, the response to one recent piece is troubling me. Naomi Aldort’s column in the March/April issue, entitled “Who Should Clean Up the Mess?” seems to have hit a hot button for many women. Naomi asks us to recognize that most children aren’t motivated to clean up their own messes and argues against coercing them to do so, on the basis that it will only create resentment and dislike for the whole idea of cleaning up. And she says that parents should accept that the need for a clean house is theirs, not their children’s, and be honest about that with their children. “There is only one ‘mess’,” she writes, “and that is the confusion of mind which tells us to expect children to be who they aren’t or to do what they don’t.”

Well! I have been ducking a firestorm of complaints ever since the article was published. We’re telling mom to be a doormat, wrote one irate reader. It’s not difficult to make the kids pick-up, said another. There is a need to address the parent’s resentments, according to one woman, if the family isn’t to live in a pigsty. Another woman wrote about having grown up in a household with a maid who picked up after the family and how “wrong and twisted” she has come to think that was. “What on earth were my parents thinking?” she cried. “Did they even care enough to think about it at all?” Whew. We appear to have unearthed a lot of deep feelings, including those about cleanliness and our roles as women and parents!

I’m pretty sure the discussion will continue in the pages of Life Learning (we try to print all the letters we receive that include first and last names, plus the city where you live)...or in this blog if you are not a Life Learning reader. But I have to ask why we can trust that our kids will learn arithmetic on their own but can’t trust them to learn how to clean up messes. Why do these readers accept that real learning does not happen under coercion but feel the need to coerce their children to pick up after themselves? Why are we making a distinction between academic and life skills?

One reader, who seems less stressed than some about the article in question, sent along this quotation for my quote collection: “Soap and education are not as sudden as a massacre, but they are more deadly in the long run.” ~ Mark Twain.
Posted: 2005/03/21 10:41 AM

The Learning Journey – March 17, 2005
I’ve been thinking about the term “growing up”. What does it mean, really? When has a person reached “up”? When they hit six feet tall? When they turn 20? Or 30? Or 50? When they can support themselves financially? Of course, those are all arbitrary criteria, set in relation to our cultural and family experiences. They are mere signposts along the road to a destination that we are not able to locate on anyone’s life map. Maybe, like Peter Pan, we never grow up!

In the same way, an education is not a destination, but a journey. We commonly speak of the importance of “getting an education”, of “finishing school”, of a person being educated or not. But I do not believe that we become educated any more than we grow up! There is always something to learn…and, in fact, many important lessons are not learned until mid-life or older. An education is not a destination, but a journey – one that begins at birth and continues until we die (or even after, depending upon your spiritual beliefs!).
Posted: 2005/03/17 10:36 AM

Suburban Angst – March 13, 2005
I’ve just screened a video entitled The End of Suburbia, for an article I’m working on for the May/June issue of Natural Life. It poses some serious questions about the viability of what has, for the past 50 years or so, been seen as a promise of space, affordability, family life and upward mobility. The film argues that suburbia may be doomed due to the decline of fossil fuels and the escalating cost of transportation. It also suggests that today’s suburbs are destined to become the slums of tomorrow unless we take action now.

Unfortunately, the daily news seems to present more negative than positive action. Our provincial government has adopted a greenbelt plan in an attempt to promote better land use, but the development industry is working hard to overturn the initiative, trying to persuade us that sprawl is good, that commuting is fun and that global warming isn’t happening. Even farmers’ groups are upset because they won’t be able to sell off their land for development when they retire! In a neighborhood on the edge of the city, the fire department recently called off a meeting when more than 1,000 people tried to cram into a room with a capacity of 450. The purpose of this meeting? To protest the expansion of a commuter rail line.

Even though the threat of major lifestyle change turns many people into ostriches, it is becoming harder and harder to escape the news about the problems with suburban living. Research worldwide is showing that fleeing to the edge of the city is not as good for one’s health as originally thought, due to the lack of exercise created by the sprawling design of suburbs, the stress of commuting on jammed highways, and the air pollution created by those commuters.

A major shift is underway, notwithstanding the number of heads in the sand. In North American cities like mine (and yes, we just moved here from the country three years ago), downtown condo and infill residential construction is booming. Planners are changing their minds about density ratios, which are still much lower here than in Europe and Asia. For those who don’t want to move back downtown, there is a phenomenon called The New Urbanism. This is the idea that suburbs can be built (or retrofitted) as walkable, compact, complete mixed-use communities, which include housing, workplaces, shops, entertainment, schools, etc., all within easy walking distance of each other.

These initiatives and many more need to be encouraged. As author and commentator on the suburban fiasco James Howard Kunstler says in The End of Suburbia, “We’re literally stuck up a cul-de-sac in a cement SUV without a fill-up.” So no matter how loud suburbanites cry about the bill of goods they’ve been sold, we’d better all do something about it fast.
Posted: 2005/03/13 1:02 PM

Slow Learning – March 6, 2005
There is one definition of intelligence that involves speed, results and competition – getting the right answer to a question quickly and doing it faster than anyone else. Many parents seem to buy into this definition by comparing the speed at which their children master skills, and being proud when they have learned to walk, talk or read before the neighbor’s kids have. Many teachers show that they value this type of intelligence by praising students who can come up with the “right” answer to an oral quiz, who solve problems quickly, or who choose the most prescribed answers on a multiple choice test within the allotted time frame. Unfortunately, some people who perform well in this sort of school setting don’t do as well in the real world. And conversely, many successful and unquestionably “intelligent” people like Albert Einstein do poorly in school.

That’s why I prefer a definition of intelligence that involves the ability to explore the world and to understand one’s experiences in it. You could call it “slow learning” because it’s not oriented towards quick results or competition with others. Rather, it involves knowing how to create hypotheses and to test them. It also understands that answers are only “right” in certain contexts and favors the personal process over the more public – and testable – product. As Harvard professor Ellen J. Langer writes in her book The Power of Mindful Learning (Perseus Books, 1998), “If we can shed [the] outcome orientation, we may discover that the freedom to define the process is more significant than achieving an outcome that has no inherent meaning or value outside that particular setting.”

When education becomes a journey rather than a destination, learning can be seen as a process of active self-determination. And that is a life’s work.
Posted: 2005/03/06 12:22 PM

Creating to Win – March 1, 2005
Winter seems to be the season of awards. The Academy Awards were announced last weekend, the Golden Globe and People’s Choice awards happened earlier this year, a variety of music industry awards have recently been handed out (and, of course, televised), the Emmy Awards for television shows will soon be announced, a raft of book awards were announced just before Christmas, etc.

Awards are ubiquitous in our society. They boost sales of books, paintings and films, and are often accompanied by cash prizes, both of which are critical to keeping the arts and artists alive. They recognize excellence in all aspects of life, which is especially important in a one-size-fits-all society. I’ve received my fair share of kudos, both informal and formal. Somewhere there is a photo of me at age 13 posing uncomfortably in the backyard with a bunch of awards for academics and attendance (!) mounted on a piece of plywood by my proud father. Although I haven’t pursued awards as an adult (and a few times have even declined nominations), I know first-hand the ego boost involved with being able to put “award-winning” in front of the word “journalist” in my bio.

So why am I feeling so grumpy? I seldom pay much attention to the awards announcements or television shows because I generally have seen none of the nominated films, listened to little of the music and read few of the books. Perhaps my tastes are oddball. Actually, I don’t like to be told that I should read, listen to or view something just because a bunch of “experts” think it’s great. I’d rather embark on the adventure of deciding for myself, even if that means wading through some occasional rubbish. Anyway, for me, art is endangered by competition and the accompanying consumerism. I fear that so much emphasis on competition can endanger the quality of artistic expression and communication, with creators consciously or subconsciously dulling the edges and lessening the risk in order to be acceptable to a jury. When people compete for recognition, they don’t share...and I believe that communication and cross-fertilization foster creativity. Just like memorizing facts in order to regurgitate them on a test isn’t real learning, writing a novel to win an award isn’t real creating.
Posted: 2005/03/01 10:24 AM

Return to current weblog
Comments? Suggestions? Email Us

 copyright © Wendy Priesnitz 2007

Topics & Passions:

natural learning
simplicity
environment
parenting
creativity / writing
books

~

What I'm reading:

Mother-Daughter Wisdom - Creating a Legacy of Physical and Emotional Health by Christiane Northrup (2005, Bantam)
Blink - The Power of Thinking Without Thinking
by Malcolm Gladwell (2005, Little, Brown & Company)
Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention
by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (1997, Perennial)
In Praise of Slow - How a Worldwide Movement is Challenging the Cult of Speed by Carl Honoré (2004, Alfred A. Knopf)

~

What I'm Listening To: 

Solo by Yo-Yo Ma (Silk Road/Sony)
Red Dragonfly
by Jane Bunnett and the Penderecki String Quartet (EMI Music)
Slow
by Ann Hampton Callaway (Shanachie Records)
Genius Loves Company by Ray Charles and friends (Concord Records)

~

Fav Bookmarks:

Deep Fun
Junkyard Sports
Council for a Livable World
The Guardian
John Taylor Gatto
Organic Consumers Association
Free2be
Common Dreams
New Scientist
News Link

~

Fav Quotes