|
Editor of
Life Learning
magazine
Editor
of
Natural Life
magazine
Author of
educational books
Small/Home
Business writer
Poet
Speaker
Interview on
Radio Free School

|
Welcome
to these regular musings, meanderings, wonderings and wanderings by Wendy
Priesnitz.
Archives
- June, 2006
Hooray for Fooling Around – June 28, 2006
As school ends for summer vacation, parents have apparently begun to
worry what to do with the little brats once they get bored by the middle
of next week. So the media trots out the interviews with “experts”
about how to find replacement warehouses…er, babysitters…and how to
schedule their children’s time so that they don’t get too
undisciplined and so that the facts stay firmly stuffed in those
apparently highly porous brains during two months of supposed
inactivity. Nothing makes me work up to a rant faster than those
interviews, which are usually juxtaposed with sounds and pictures of
kids celebrating their emancipation.
This morning, I heard one “expert” cautioning
that children need free time over the summer, except that it should be
the “fooling around with a purpose” kind of free time. Aside from
the hidden message that learning and fun are incompatible, this person,
being an educator apparently knowledgeable about play, should know
better. Fooling around is how kids learn. Fooling around always has a purpose for
kids. This educator meant the kind of purpose that an adult imposes…that is,
a curriculum-related purpose. If, on the off-chance, a child has really
learned something in school, she won’t forget it over the summer. In
fact, she might use what she learned while fooling around this summer!
However, most of what these well-meaning adults are concerned about
children forgetting hasn’t really been learned; it’s been memorized
with indifference. And it may well be long forgotten by September as the
emancipated children steer clear of anything that looks or smells like
school. And
in place of that memorized stuff that seemed so irrelevant to their
lives is bound to be some real learning that resulted from a
summer of freedom to think, experiment, make mistakes, correct them,
read, day dream and fool around.
Posted: 2006/06/28 5:13
PM
Growing Up Too Soon – June 27, 2006
This morning, I was sitting writing in my favorite café. Past me walked
a little boy of perhaps three or four, holding his mother’s hand and
looking very unhappy. Almost immediately, he began crying – that
tearless sort of sobbing that means one’s heart is breaking. While his
mother ordered and waited for her drink, she ignored her son’s wails.
Nobody else in the café could. Two other women, apparently
acquaintances of the mother, asked what was wrong with the child. “He
wants to stay home today,” she said, “but he has to go to daycare.
He’ll be fine. You know, he has just finished preschool and is going
to junior kindergarten in the fall, which is so exciting.” One of the
women tried to distract the little one by talking to him. She told him
he was soooo grown up and asked him if he’d just graduated. He looked
at her briefly, then began pulling his mother toward the door, yelling,
“Home.” He apparently didn’t think it was so exciting to have
graduated to another level of home-leaving.
Perhaps the graduation comment was inspired by an
article in this morning’s paper.
With no irony at all, the piece describes a senior kindergarten
graduation, complete with caps, gowns, diplomas and ceremony. The
parents gushed, the kindergarten teacher spoke of milestones and
becoming independent (turning from caterpillars into butterflies) as
they “graduated” from half-day attendance to sitting in desks and
listening to teachers talk on a full-time basis. The kids in the
accompanying photo look bored already.
But perhaps the most telling comment came from one
six-year-old who said his favorite part of the event was having his mom
there. Too bad so many moms are so eager to push their children away,
under the questionable guises of independence and education.
Posted: 2006/06/27 3:28
PM
Authoritarianism and the Environment, Eh? – June
16, 2006
Both of the magazines I own and edit –
Life Learning and Natural Life
– have huge numbers of American subscribers, even though I live and
work in Canada; as a matter of fact, Life Learning’s U.S.
circulation is far higher than its Canadian circulation. Many of our
American friends tell us that they admire Canada and Canadians
as being progressive on both topics – non-coercive education and
sustainable living. And recent research seems to agree.
According to Canadian pollster Michael Adams of
Environics, one of the ways in which Canadians differ from Americans is
their take on authoritarianism and patriarchy. Addressing a conference
on progressive politics that has been taking place this week at a Quebec
resort, Adams, the author of Fire and Ice: The United States, Canada
and the Myth of Converging Values, said that the idea of the father as
head of the family has been eroding in Canada since 1992. In the
United States, however, it’s been growing. In 1992, 26 percent of Canadians said
they agreed with the statement: “The father of the family must be
the master of his own house.” In 2005, only 18 percent of
Canadians agree with that notion, according to Adams. By contrast, 52 percent of Americans agreed with that statement in
2005, an increase of 10 percent since 1992.
Another apparent difference is our attitude about the
environment, which Adams told the conference is poised to become “a
secular religion” in Canada in the years ahead. For the first time since the 1980s has gained
prominence as one of the issues Canadians define as most urgent in their
response to polls. That attitude was underscored at the conference in a
presentation by former U.S. vice-president Al Gore. He told reporters that he was encouraged by talk
of progressive politics in Canada, especially if it encompasses a renewed movement toward environmental
stewardship.
Posted: 2006/06/16 2:45
PM
Definitely Not Deprivation –
June 14, 2006
I’m just off the phone from speaking with a reporter who
called to explore the idea of writing an article about “unschooling”,
which seems to have suddenly hit the media’s radar...even if they don’t
understand it. True to her training,
she was poking around trying to find a clue to the negative aspect of
learning outside of school. “Nothing’s perfect,” she told me
assuredly. “What about the lack of structure, the lack of exposure to
diversity, the socialization….?” I suddenly realized that she thinks
that children who are not attending school lead empty daily lives, unless
their time is filled up by teacher-emulating parents. I sighed and told her
that nothing short of total immersion would allow her really to understand
the concept of life learning because it is so apparently foreign to the way
most people think of education and, indeed, of childhood. Home-based
learning is not deprivation, of course. It is not a lack of something,
whether it be structure, social experiences, exposure to diversity,
information, facts, intellectual training, or anything else positive, for
that matter. It is the very opposite, embodying a filling up of
children’s lives, rather than an emptying, exposure to a wealth of
positive socialization and intellectual experiences flowing from real-life.
This unfortunate misconception about non-school-based education results
from a view that a child is clay to be shaped, that the brain is a vessel
to be filled, that school procedures are the “gold standard” of
education. Those misconceptions meant that this particular reporter wasn't willing or able
to hear what I was saying. Nor could she admit that she hasn’t got a clue what home-based
education is and isn’t. So much for journalistic “balance.”
Posted: 2006/06/14 10:25
AM
Learning
Independence – June 11, 2006
My mother, who was close to death last fall, has recently recovered
enough to celebrate her 97th birthday. On Mother’s Day, she
was well enough that she was able to be interviewed for
the life history that is being written about me for Natalie Zur Nedden’s
PhD
dissertation. I’ve been reading the transcript of the interview and
have learned much from my mother’s short and sometimes muddled
responses to Natalie’s gentle questioning. Reminiscing about my early
school experiences, my mother told Natalie that she participated in the
school’ s parent organization because I needed her. During the
interview, that response was one of a few that astounded me, and when
pressed for more, she reverted to her habitual taciturnity. But I think
she meant that I needed the safety of her proximity. I didn’t think so
at the time and, in fact, remember disliking having my mother hovering
when I wanted to take some steps toward independence. But, of course,
learning to be independent within a safely supportive environment – and
on their own timetable – is one of the reasons why I kept my own young
daughters out of school! And now I’m feeling glad that mother listened
to her instinct to protect her young daughter, even though I bristled at
the attention at the time…and that I ignored those well-meaning
interferers who prodded me to “cut the apron strings” while my own
daughters still needed me.
Posted: 2006/06/11 2:35 PM
Urgent Appeal to Help a Homeschooling Family –
June 9, 2006
In February of this year, a family in Montreal fell victim to a
convoluted and bizarre set of actions, reactions and circumstances that
resulted in two home educated boys, ages nine and 10, being put into
foster care. The reasons given by a judge in youth protection court were
that the parents (both academics preparing for careers as university
professors) were negligent of their children’s health and schooling.
The youngest boy was diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes
when he was three and subsequently homeschooled by his parents, at the
suggestion of the local school principal, who said he couldn’t
guarantee that the school would help the child manage his disease. In
spite of school board reports that he and his brother were doing well
learning at home, a dispute arose with the school and the family’s
file was forwarded, as a truancy issue, to youth protection services. An
apparently inexperienced worker took them to court, successfully
removed the children from their home and forced additional medical
attention and increased medication on the diabetic boy.
The family couldn’t afford a lawyer to defend them
in court. Eventually, after the media publicized the case, the Quebec
Association for Home-Based Education (QAHBE) supplied the family with a
lawyer. And immediately after the lawyer appeared on the scene, the children were allowed to return home pending
the outcome of a court case this week (with judgment to be rendered at
the end of the school year, presumably in a few weeks). The cost of legal representation
isn’t being completely covered by QAHBE, so interested education activist and children’s rights advocate
Marilyn Rowe is fundraising. For details, visit
a special website set up for that purpose. The site has links to news
items about the situation.
It makes me sad, angry and frustrated that this
sort of thing is still happening in Canada
in regards to home-based education. And those emotions are intensely
heightened by the fact that just today a couple was sentenced in Toronto
for causing the death, through neglect, starvation and other abuse, of a
child who had been put in their foster care by so-called “child
protection” authorities in spite of previous convictions for child
abuse. We should, as a society, be questioning the
motives and methods of both “educational” and “child protection”
institutions.
Posted: 2006/06/09 1:40 PM
A Different View of Daycare – June 8, 2006
An ad hoc group of
caregivers will be assembling at Queen’s Park in
Toronto on Tuesday June 13, and inviting all 102 provincial politicians to an
information session about the needs of parents who do not use the one
currently funded style of daycare. Spokespeople will include Betty Cornelius
from Cangrands (grandparent care), Bruce MacIntosh (care of autistic
children at home), Andrea Riley (at-home mother care, member of CUPE),
Bette Jean Crewe (OFA – rural home-based care), Mark Alan Whittle
(parental care of handicapped child), Kathy Graham (for profit and other
unfunded daycare) as well as homeschoolers, researchers (Helen Ward,
Kids First Parent Association of Canada) and pensioners who will speak of the
tax implications and best interests of the child. This grassroots
movement has zero funding from government, in contrast to the heavily
funded lobby held last week by daycare advocacy groups. Those groups
have also received project funding from government departments of health, human resources, social development, justice and
status of women.
Organizer Sara Landriault – a stay-at-home mother
of three daughters – says, “When I heard the non-profit daycare
advocates held a meeting at Queen’s Park I realized that the members
of provincial Parliament needed to hear everyone’s side of the
childcare story. My intention is not to stop daycare but to equalize the
funding across Canada for all childcare choices.”
Daycare, like public education, labors under the burden of
popular opinion that there is only one correct perspective, one set of
needs and one way of
doing things. Progress happens when we all (politicians included) climb out
of our favorite boxes and open our minds to the big picture. If you live in
Ontario, contact your MPP and ask them to attend this session. The organizers
will be taking attendance.
Posted: 2006/06/08 12:18 PM
Interest and Respect – June 2, 2006
There’s a new plan here in Ontario
to help the estimated 20,000 grade 9 students who are risk of dropping
out of high school (or rising up, as Teenage Liberation Handbook author
Grace Llewellyn prefers to call it). According to politicians and
educators, the key elements of the plan will be to protect self-esteem
by encouraging students to take courses they like – which “capture
their imagination” is the way the Minister of Education puts it – as
well as to provide more individual attention. One high school even gets
school staff to treat students with respect and make them feel welcome!
Gosh, it feels like schools might be learning
something from unschoolers! Not that it’s rocket science...or anything
less than basic human rights.
Posted: 2006/06/02 10:28 AM
Return
to current weblog
Comments? Suggestions? Email
Us
copyright ©
Wendy Priesnitz 2007
|
Topics & Passions:
natural learning
simplicity
environment
parenting
creativity / writing
books
~
What I'm
Reading:
Epicurean Simplicity by Stephanie Mills (2002, Island Press)
Critical Lessons: What Our Schools Should Teach by Nel Noddings
(2006, Cambridge University Press)
Dropped Threads 3 - Beyond the Small Circle by Marjorie Anderson,
ed (2006, Random House)
Carry Tiger to Mountain - The Tao of Activism and Leadership by
Stephen Legault (2006, Arsenal Pulp Press)
~ What
I'm Listening To:
Where We Live - A Benefit CD for EarthJustice
(Higher Octave Music, 2003)
Best of Ella Fitzgerald and Louis Armstrong (Verve, 1997)
Surprise by Paul Simon (Warner Music, 2006)
~
Fav
Bookmarks:
Positive News
Parenting Without Punishing
Institute for Local Self-Reliance
The Guardian
Organic Consumers Association
Free2be
Common Dreams
Grist Magazine
News Link
~
Fav Quotes:
Art, Writing, Creativity
Life and Living
Men and Women
Learning
Environment and Peace
|