Editor of
Life Learning
magazine

Editor of 
Natural Life
magazine

Author of
educational books

Small/Home
Business writer

Poet

Speaker

Interview on Radio Free School

 

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome to these regular musings, meanderings, wonderings and wanderings by Wendy Priesnitz.  

Archives - July, 2006

September University – July 24, 2006
Yesterday, I received an update from colleague and occasional Life Learning contributor Charles Hayes. He is promoting a new way of aging, with the aim of erasing the notion of retirement from our vocabulary. And he’s dubbed it “September University.” He writes, “September University…is a vision of retirement that replaces a time devoted to doing very little with a time of reflection, when people who’ve entered the September of life have the opportunity to make their greatest contribution to the generations to follow. A September University frame of mind means looking forward to sifting through a half-century or more of experience, sorting those things that are truly important from those that aren’t, and finding ways to pass on that wisdom.” His sense is that many people were so turned-off learning by their formal education experiences that they avoid the kind of contemplation and knowledge-creation that the world so badly needs. Hayes has been writing about self-education for more than two decades. He has published five books on the subject and one novel. His latest book, The Rapture of Maturity: A Legacy of Lifelong Learning, is concerned with using our knowledge and experience in our later years and leaving the world a better place in the process. And he has a new book in progress entitled September University: Rediscover the Wonder of Existence and Help Change the World. He’s set up an online dialog, accessible on the September-U website for people who are interested in exploring the concept.
Posted: 2006/07/24 5:29 PM

Is it the Bullying or the Drugs? – July 23, 2006
Beatrice Ekwa Ekoko is a Canadian writer whose three daughters learn without attending school. For the last five years she and her husband have been producing Radio Free School, a weekly radio show by, for and about unschoolers. She is also an occasional contributor to Life Learning magazine. Beatrice has begun a series of six columns on the subject of homeschooling to be published on the CBC website. The first column went up last week. At the end of each column is a selection of comments from readers. One poor, uninformed public school supporter asked, “What about the social skills that home-schooled children will never experience due to seclusion?” Aside from displaying his total ignorance of the subject and ignoring what Beatrice wrote about the richness of the life learning lifestyle, this guy must be talking about a school system on another planet. He wrote about the “important life lessons [that] are learned on the playground every day” and said that homeschoolers are overprotective parents who are keeping their kids away from the real world, which he equates to child neglect.

Maybe it was supposed to be irony. Or maybe the guy is an articulate (albeit macho) ostrich. I can’t imagine he’s a caring parent…or else why would he want to expose his children to the bullying, violence, competition, drug dealing and otherwise general mean-spirited and negative “socialization” that occurs on playgrounds, let alone what goes on in many classrooms? His reasoning appears to be that “These children will then lack social interactions once they leave the home, furthering their educations in university and/or college.” Aha! Life is violent, competitive, mean-spirited and boring, so we need to expose our children to those things from an early age in order to prepare them. Nonsense. Even if one agrees that life is that awful, the best preparation for a bad adult experience is a good childhood one. One like that experienced by most life learners – rich in contacts with people of all ages, full of meaningful interactions in their communities and grounded in trust and respect for their humanity. And gosh, what about trying to change that awful life?? Is that not one of the purposes of good socialization?

There may be valid reasons for parents to send their kids to school, but socialization isn’t one of them. That homeschooled children are poorly socialized is a dead argument, slaughtered a long time ago by generations of superbly well-socialized adults who learned without attending school and buried by the ongoing socialization problems in public schools.
Posted: 2006/07/23 3:14 PM

Freedom and Self-Knowledge – July 19, 2006
I continue to ponder the idea of the sort of group learning that we call school. Is the institution inherently good or bad, benign or problematic? Is the concept flawed, or is the word merely tainted? For me, there are a couple of issues involved. One is the idea of group learning and group interaction; the other has to do with choice.

As my children were growing up, I saw the benefit of being able to figure out who they were first, on their own and within their supportive family environment, before moving away from the family setting and on to collaborative learning in larger groups. There are varying opinions on the appropriate age for this to happen, but I trusted that they would find their own speed and path. And they did. (Their choices eventually involved regular school, choices I respected but did not agree with.)

And that leads to the choice part. I’ve always felt that the biggest problem with the concept of school is compulsory attendance. While there may be some schools for children that are voluntary, they are rare. Even the much-lauded Sudbury Valley model forces students to make an attendance commitment. And maybe the infrastructure involved – building, staff, materials, meetings – needs the stability of a somewhat dependable group of regular participants. But is a school truly democratic if attendance is compulsory…even if it’s run democratically on every other level? Or, to put it another way, does it rank the freedom of children lower than its own health or survival?

In response to my July 6 post on this subject, Jessica Kiley wrote: “I think it was John Holt who shared this perspective on schools –the ingredient that is missing from every school, even the ‘free schools’ that were experimented with years back, is that attendance is required, not a choice. Even if a child has complete freedom to choose the lessons, or to choose an activity other than participating in the lessons, the choice is generally not included to leave the school altogether or to attend by personal motivation alone.”

In fact, as Life Learning columnist Sandy Lubert shared in the May/June issue, in Instead of Education, Holt “used spelling creatively in order to distinguish between S-chools, where educators ‘get and hold their students by the threat of jail or uselessness or poverty’ and s-schools, ‘which help people explore the world as they choose.” An interesting concept, but I think we’d be better off designing some new language to describe learning that is truly non-coercive, rather than using creative spelling or appending prefixes like “home”, “un” or “de” to the “s” word. A democratic school is better than an undemocratic one, but it’s still a school. I don’t mind leaving schools of all stripes to those who want them, but my work involves changing the whole paradigm to reflect the fact that people do not have to be forced to learn. Nor do they have to attend special places to do it. 
Posted: 2006/07/19 8:09 AM

Getting Bored – July 18, 2006
I’m working hard this week to finish off our magazines one week early so I can take a vacation. So, in effect, I’m speeding up so I can slow down. My normal speed of life is pretty frenetic, so slowing down is a relative term. But I’m searching for a more long-term slower rhythm, trying to make changes in my life and my work so I can be bored. Boredom, I theorize, can be a good state – ultimately leading to creativity and productivity, as I wrote a few years ago in Life Learning. I think that’s because boredom creates some space for peace of mind to creep in.

Usually an efficient multi-tasker, I’m not good at being bored, typically trying to fill up the empty moments with work or random activity, to speed up the slower pace. So on this vacation, I’m going to try to dilute the adrenaline, to let go of my to-do list, to practice doing nothing for awhile, to try and get bored. I guess the process is a bit like learning to meditate – being patient with yourself until it becomes second nature.

I am not sure why I’m so careful to avoid boredom, although I suspect it has something to do with all those earnest clichés I heard as a child, which turned me into a doer rather than a “be-er” (which, in itself, isn’t such a bad thing.) Like idle hands being the devil’s playground and an idle mind being the devil’s workshop (or was it vice versa?) and the need to make hay while the sun shines. But as an adult, I know that the word “bore” has another definition that involves tunneling through something, so I’m using that analogy to get to the other side of my dedication to work and to find that elusive peace of mind. Gotta get back to work now.
Posted: 2006/07/18 3:20 PM

30 Years of History – July 16, 2006
This fall marks the 30th anniversary of the company that publishes Life Learning magazine – a company that my husband Rolf and I launched in 1976 to publish books and Natural Life magazine. We were looking for a way to generate an income so that we could both stay at home with our life learning daughters Heidi and Melanie, who were ages four and three at the time. Looking back over those three decades, we are proud that we have been at the leading edge (and ahead of it, in some cases) of many progressive trends and movements, from independent publishing itself, through environmentally sustainable business practices, home-based business, green politics, the natural foods industry (I published a natural foods industry magazine in the early 1980s) and, of course, learner-directed homeschooling.

For Natural Life magazine’s birthday, I have been putting together a retrospective of the last 30 years. In doing so, I recently came across an editorial that I wrote in 1979 sharing a bad experience we’d had with a truant officer – he’d entered our home by means of a lie, then threatened us with the removal of our 5-1/2- and 7-year-old daughters if we didn't enroll them in a public school within two hours. That, of course, was not the correct procedure (to put it mildly!) and he found out that we knew more about our rights than he did (again, to put it mildly.) As a result of that experience, I decided there was a need to organize homeschooling families. So my editorial also announced that I was founding a pioneering homeschool support and advocacy organization. Our daughters have grown up, the movement has grown up and our business has matured with the addition of Life Learning magazine almost five years ago. It’s been an exciting journey, and we look forward to more adventures and more progress towards a better society.
Posted: 2006/07/16 7:40 PM

Ranking Educational Alternatives – July 6, 2006
Over the past few months, I’ve had two articles submitted for publication in Life Learning magazine from parents who have sent their children to a specific model of “democratic school” after a period of homeschooling/unschooling. In both cases, family circumstances led to the change. And in both cases, the families were very happy with the schools, to the degree that they have both become big boosters of that particular brand of school. In fact, they both feel that the school experience is “identical but superior” to learning at home. These two articles have got my mind churning. Is there a need to rank alternatives? I don’t think so – there is a need for many alternative choices in all aspects of life and some will be more suitable for each of us at different times and in different situations. (Did we learn to rank in school?) Can the life learning process really happen in a school, democratic or otherwise? I don’t think it can, but I need to be sure my own bias isn’t getting in the way. Are parents and other immediate family members an integral part of the education process? Not necessarily, but most of the time they provide the best type of nurturing for their children. Do most of us at one time or other create sweeping but incorrect generalizations from specific situations? Of course we do. What, in fact, is a school? I don’t have the answer to that one right now.

I wrote five fast pages in my journal this morning about these questions and their answers. I feel another book…or at least an article…coming on. Feedback, as always, is welcome.
Posted: 2006/07/06 3:45 PM

Kids Can Claim Age Discrimination – July 1, 2006
I can’t think of a better way celebrate Canada Day than to thank the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal for ruling against age discrimination against children. This province’s Human Rights Code currently prohibits those under 18 from claiming age discrimination. (Who knew? And I wonder how many other jurisdictions have that provision.) Anyway, the government has been using that provision to cut off therapy funding for autistic children once they reach the age of six, in spite of the ruling Liberal party’s pre-election promise to fund the therapy for all autistic children. A group of families has been trying to access the funding through the courts; the government has been claiming the right to cut off funding on the basis of age. But now, the Human Rights Tribunal has ruled in favor of the children, saying that the Human Rights Code provision that allows for age discrimination under the age of 18 violates children’s rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The tribunal’s decision is not law unless/until it is adopted or cited by the courts, but it is good news for the families in the autism case who are now free to proceed in court with their argument that the government is discriminating against them on the basis of age, as well as disability. But it could also be very good news for all children, who may now be able to complain that they are being discriminated against in other aspects of life. Hmmmm. Wonder that could mean for compulsory education laws?
Posted: 2006/07/01 1:51 PM

Return to current weblog
Comments? Suggestions? Email Us

copyright © Wendy Priesnitz 2007

Topics & Passions:

natural learning
simplicity
environment
parenting
creativity / writing
books

~

What I'm Reading:

The Self-Completing Tree, poems by Dorothy Livesay (1999, Beach Holme Publishing)
Dropped Threads 3 - Beyond the Small Circle by Marjorie Anderson, ed (2006, Random House)
Carry Tiger to Mountain - The Tao of Activism and Leadership
by Stephen Legault (2006, Arsenal Pulp Press)

~

What I'm Listening To: 

Where We Live - A Benefit CD for EarthJustice (Higher Octave Music, 2003)
Best of Ella Fitzgerald and Louis Armstrong
(Verve, 1997)
Surprise by Paul Simon (Warner Music, 2006)

~

Fav Bookmarks:

Positive News
Parenting Without Punishing
Institute for Local Self-Reliance
The Guardian
Organic Consumers Association
Free2be
Common Dreams
Grist Magazine
News Link

~

Fav Quotes:

Art, Writing, Creativity
Life and Living
Men and Women
Learning
Environment and Peace