Challenging Assumptions blog by Wendy Priesnitz

Melanie and Wendy

Personal Site

Editor-in-Chief of 
Natural Life magazine

Author of unschooling books

Small/Home Business writer

Poet

Interview from Life Learning

Blog Updates

 What is RSS?

Facebook Page

 

 

 

Challenging Assumptions in Education by Wendy Priesnitz

Natural Life magazine

Bringing it Home - A Home Business Guide by Wendy Priesnitz

School Free - The Home Schooling Handbook by Wendy Priesnitz

Natural Child magazine

Life Learning Magazine

Musings, meanderings, wonderings and wanderings about unschooling, natural  parenting, green living, social justice and more by writer, author and Natural Life magazine editor Wendy Priesnitz. 

Archives - December, 2008

Santa Claus? – December 31, 2008
I’ve just been catching up on some reading and enjoyed this column about whether or not parents should foster a belief in Santa. It was published last week in the Washington Post and written by Carl Honoré, author of In Praise of Slow and Under Pressure: Rescuing Our Children From the Culture of Hyper-Parenting. Relax and enjoy. And have a very happy New Year. (The big news around here is that I am planning to stay up for the midnight kiss and champagne for the first time in – oh, about 40 years.) Cheers.
Posted: 2008/12/31 5:56 PM

Devaluing the Currency of Education – December 29, 2008
I recently read in our local paper about degree scams. In one instance, a variety of people – including a manager in the registrar’s office at a community college, a U.S. State Department official, a police tactical trainer and a law student who had been offered a job articling with a prestigious law firm – had paid thousands of dollars for fake university degrees. Some of these people admitted they knew their degrees were bogus and others claimed they had submitted course work or said they thought they were awarded real degrees for life experiences. The law student suggested to the reporter that she had been a victim of identity fraud before admitting to both the lie and the phony degree. Some of those who admitted knowing about the fake credentials said it was “an ego thing;” others had based careers on their degrees.

Putting aside the law student’s alarming level of dishonesty, I have to ask if she able to do her course work because of some prior experience and knowledge that would have earned her credit for life experience if such had been legitimately available. And what about the standards of the law firm that had offered her a position? Did they put such value in the currency of her credentials that they overlooked due diligence?

Or perhaps they didn’t care much about the credentials and had another way to judge her potential success with their company. Maybe they were looking for something other than framed pieces of paper hanging on the wall or a march of letters after a name – the symbols of having been turned into an “expert” on the educational production line. Not likely, you say. But if not, then why do we legitimately bestow these symbols on certain people who were never processed? Honorary degrees are regularly awarded by universities to politicians, writers and other public figures who ironically have often made their mark without attending a post-secondary institution (or at least not the one giving them the degree). And while few would suggest that honorary degrees are bought like those from diploma mills, many honorary degrees are awarded to those who can donate large sums of money to the granting institution, or at least provide it with a profile that can attract funds from others.

At any rate, as Harvard’s Howard Gardner wrote in his 1991 book The Unschooled Mind, schools at all levels have increasingly substituted test results and various credentials for genuine knowledge and demonstrated understanding. And as I wrote in my book Challenging Assumptions in Education, “Since studies show there is little correlation between education levels and job performance (notwithstanding the specialized technical training that can be essential), there is no reason to judge people’s employability (or anything else for that matter, except their ability to write tests and essays) by their degrees. So those of us who are in hiring positions can, in some cases, reconsider policies that require university or college degrees. We can look at a wide range of other qualifications, such as job and practical life experience, related skills and level of maturity. To really change the cult-of-experts mentality, many of us will have to examine our own past university experiences, separate our identities as people from our university degrees...and try letting our names appear naked on our business cards.” Maybe that would eliminate the problem of diploma mills.
Posted: 2008/12/29 3:25 PM

Pearl Kathileen Worfolk (nee Knox) died peacefully on December 14, 2008 at The WestBury Long Term Care Home in  Toronto, Ontario, after suffering a stroke. Kathileen (Kay) was in her 100th year and is survived by her only child Wendy and her son-in-law Rolf Priesnitz of Toronto; her granddaughters Melanie of Avonport, Nova Scotia and Heidi of Wolfville, Nova Scotia; as well as numerous nieces and nephews across Canada. Born in Winnipeg, Manitoba in 1909, she grew up in Grassy Lake, Alberta and Long Branch, Ontario. As an adult, she lived in Toronto, Hamilton, Cambridge, Orillia and Paris, Ontario. The eldest of nine children, she was pre-deceased by her husband Vincent Worfolk in 1965. Cremation will be followed by a private family graveside service. On Kathileen’s request, memorial donations may be made to the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.

 

We Need a New Way of Tracking the Costs – December 1, 2008
The global economy is losing more money from the disappearance of forests than through the current banking crisis, according to a recently released EU-funded study. The report puts the annual cost of forest loss at between $2 trillion and $5 trillion (or about seven percent of global GDP), as opposed to the estimated $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion lost on Wall Street during the current economic “crisis.”

Speaking to BBC News at the recent World Conservation Congress, study leader and Deutsche Bank economist Pavan Sukhdev emphasized that the cost of natural declining natural capital dwarfs losses on the financial markets and has been happening every year. (Watch Sukhdev on YouTube talk about the WWF’s Living Planet Report.)

This calculation of the financial cost of environmental degradation is a new way of looking at things, at least among the guys at the top. And it might be too new to be on the radar of most of the 8,000 delegates from 180 countries who attending the international climate talks beginning today in Poznan, Poland. If it’s not front-of-mind, the current economic worries will make it hard for them to keep fighting global warming. Lower oil prices mean less of an incentive to invest in renewables. Already, wind and solar power companies are slashing spending and the value of their stocks is plummeting. That’s crazy, given the urgent need for renewable energy!

However, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has said that it would cost less than 0.12 per cent of global gross domestic (GDP) product every year until 2030 to avert the worst of climate change. So what are we waiting for? I think we need a paradigm shift, a whole new way of looking at quality of life that goes far beyond the GDP and the stock market, and that questions the value of growth at any cost. We’re fixated on the GDP’s rise or fall as an indicator of how well things are progressing or not. But the problem is that the GDP just measures spending and makes no distinctions between transactions that add to well-being and those that diminish it; as long as money changes hands, the GDP increases. For instance, under the GDP, environmental pollution ends up being a positive because it creates economic activity – and is even counted positively twice: once when it’s created and again when it’s cleaned up. And the result of that pollution, which is often illness such as cancer, also ends up on the plus side of the ledger because it, too, creates economic activity. This mindset also affects families because, for instance, it doesn’t account for things like the value of household and volunteer work, which are invisible in the GDP because no money changes hands. And it values schooling – no matter how awful the quality – because, once again, it creates economic activity.

There is a rising awareness of this problem and there are some solutions being proposed. I’ve been writing about them for decades. Here is a simple article explaining the issues, that will appear in Natural Life in March/April 2009 but is now on the website because it’s too important to wait.
Posted:
2008/12/01 9:30 PM

Comments? Suggestions? Email me

copyright © Wendy Priesnitz 2008

Topics & Passions

life learning / unschooling
simplicity
environment
natural parenting
creativity / writing
books

~

Monthly Archives

~

What I'm Reading

The Self-Organizing Revolution: Common Principles of the Educational  Alternatives Movement by Ron Miller (Holistic Education Press, 2008)
Hot, Flat and Crowded
by Thomas Friedman (Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2008)
The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity and the Renewal of Civilization by Thomas Homer-Dixon (Vintage, 2007)

~

What I'm Listening To

Keep it Simple by Van Morrison (Exile Productions, 2008)

~

Fav Bookmarks

Daughter Blog
The Mother/Daughter Project
TED: Ideas Worth Spreading
Organic Consumers Association
Grist
We Are What We Do
Free Rice
Mothers Movement Online
Personalised Education Now

~

Fav Quotes

Art, Writing, Creativity
Life and Living
Men and Women
Learning
Environment and Peace