Editor of
Life Learning
magazine

Editor of 
Natural Life
magazine

Author of
educational books

Small/
Home Business
writer

Poet

Speaker

 

 

 

 

 

 

Welcome to these regular musings, meanderings, wonderings and wanderings by Wendy Priesnitz.  

Archives - April, 2005

Downshifting – April 29, 2005
Whether you call it voluntary simplicity, slow living or downshifting, the idea of getting out of the retrace and living more meaningfully is catching on. The index of such articles published over the past ten years in Natural Life is one of the most visited pages on our website. In the UK, this is the end of National Downshifting Week. Conceived and organized by writer and self-described downshifter Tracey Smith, it has been, by all accounts, a great success. Smith wrote to say that she has been traveling all over England this week helping people find ways to live more simply, less stressfully and more sustainably. The website is full of things individuals and families can do year round to downshift. Smith says she plans to take Downshifting Week international next year.
Posted: 2005/04/29 10:58 AM

Testing & Cynicism – April 24, 2005
An article in the British newspaper The Guardian on April 16 reported an increase in the number of teenagers caught cheating in public exams, fuelled by a 16 percent rise in offences linked to mobile phones. Apparently, some students are using their cell phones to receive answers for math and science tests via text messaging. The paper noted this week that children in England are examined more than in any other country.

Cheating in school is nothing new. But I clearly recall from my own high school experience 40 years ago that it was caused by pressure – from parents, teachers and “the system” – to perform well. That meant, of course, getting the correct answer on a test, a feat that would lead to both short-term (a bike if I passed grade 8) and longer-term (advancement to the next grade along with my friends and eventually a supposedly well-paying job) rewards. In the minds of us students, it had little or nothing to do with learning anything. In this era of high-stakes testing, I am not surprised that there is even more pressure on students to produce the right answers on tests. As I’ve written in this column before, many parents are pushing their kids ever harder to perform well so they can get a head start in the rat race by getting ahead in the job market. At the same time, teachers and schools whose students perform well can receive financial incentives, while those performing below standard on tests are threatened with reprimands and/or budget cuts.

This sort of pressure has negative consequences on students’ learning and on their psychological well-being. Stressed-out teachers who teach-to-the-test are hardly able to do more than force their students to memorize facts that will soon be forgotten. There is a growing body of research showing that students subjected to such a narrowly focused view of the world lose any motivation, commitment to learning and love of knowledge they once had. (For instance, see Edward Deci and Richard Ryan’s work on Self-Determination Theory at the University of Rochester.) In the workplace, it is well understood that assessment which provides specific, one-on-one feedback in an atmosphere without pressure or control will result in employees with increased self-motivation who become more effective in meeting challenges. Why don’t we extend that experience to kids?

So it is not surprising that young people are becoming increasingly disengaged and cynical about tests, resulting in increased levels of cheating. In order to change that, we must allow them to feel like competent and autonomous members of a learning society, rather than like parrots programmed to regurgitate other people’s words under pressure.
Posted: 2005/04/24 1:19 PM

Happy Earth Day – April 22, 2005
Today is the 35th anniversary of Earth Day. It’s also nearing the 30th anniversary of my publishing company, Life Media. Back in the winter of 1975 when my husband Rolf launched The Alternate Press to publish our first book, Natural Life magazine was still a tiny seed of an idea. That seed germinated over the following spring and summer, growing into the first issue of Natural Life in October of 1976. Those were heady days, as the environmental movement gathered steam and everyone involved sensed the huge potential for creating change. We joked then about how we hoped that we’d put ourselves out of business within a decade because the ideas of self-reliant thinking and environmental sustainability would be so common there would be no need for the magazine. Well, the ideas are certainly more common, but a report out yesterday showing that Antarctica is melting faster than scientists previously thought has me questioning how far we have really come. Judging by the glut of press releases I’ve received this week – both cynical and earnest – touting how everyone from banks and SUV manufacturers to house cleaners is greening up, environmentalism is now mainstream. But there is still a need for Natural Life and its newly sprouting collection of counterparts, because in spite of green fads and three decades of work by hundreds of thousands of people, our Earth is still in grave danger.

However, Earth Day is supposed to be one of celebration. And since this month also marks Rolf’s and my 35th wedding anniversary, I’m in a positive mood. So let’s see the glass as half full and use this day to renew our efforts to walk more lightly on this planet. Happy Earth Day.
Posted: 2005/04/22 10:15 AM

Women Do Politics Differently – April 16, 2005
Political life in Canada these days is in a mess. A scandal about sponsorship money gone wrong has the less-than-one-year-old minority government in a free-fall and the opposition parties gearing up for a quick election. Daily revelations at a government-called inquiry are vying with unseasonably warm weather for people’s attention. However, I’ve been noticing something odd about this particular problem: there is a lack of women involved. The politicians, the bureaucrats, the ad agency people are pretty much all male.

I suspect there are a few reasons for that. First of all, there are fewer women in such powerful jobs. Canada ranks 36th in the world among democracies in terms of women’s representation in the national legislature, after Monaco and Nicaragua. And we’re not getting any better. According to a multi-partisan group called Equal Voice – An Action Group for the Election of Women, the number of women candidates running for election in Canada has actually been decreasing – falling from a high of 476 women candidates in 1993 to just 373 in the last federal election. And in the ruling Liberal party, which is at the heart of the current scandal, women candidates dropped from a high of 84 in 1997 to just 66 in 2000.

Secondly, women do politics differently than men, something I discovered during a brief stint as leader of the Green Party of Canada in the mid 1990s. (I resigned largely because of those differences.) But don’t take my word for it. The World Bank – not exactly a bastion of feminism or progressivism – reported just that in a 1999 paper entitled “Are Women Really the ‘Fairer’ Sex?”. The study matched up a so-called “corruption index” used in economic research against a survey of women’s representation in elected office. The results were clear: “The greater the representation of women in parliament, the lower the level of corruption” and that “women should be particularly effective in promoting honest government.” Earlier this year, Equal Voice wrote to the leaders of Canadian political parties asking them to ensure the nomination and election of more women for the next election. I hope the guys listened and that the next election won’t be too soon, so that they can use lack of time as an excuse not to include more women in the political process...and thus clean up the mess. Otherwise, citizen cynicism will continue to grow.
Posted: 2005/04/16 2:52 PM

We’re All Gifted – April 10, 2005
I’ve recently been approached to write about enrichment programs in school settings, and about whether home-based learning works for so-called “gifted” students. I’m having trouble deciding whether or not I want to take on this assignment. First of all, I believe that everyone is gifted – especially if they are allowed to develop their talents in a richly stimulating environment like some schools offer only to certain elite students.

A decade ago, the principal of our local public elementary school invited me to help a multi-grade group of “gifted” students learn about journalism and newspaper publishing. I agreed, preparing a couple of sessions to demonstrate reporting, interviewing and news writing, to which the young people responded well. Of course, not all of them were interested in the topic, but most of them seemed to enjoy the experience anyway. Then they became reporters. They each covered an event at their school and wrote about it, using the techniques they had supposedly learned. The next time I met with them, I provided editorial feedback, in the same way I would to adult journalists, true to the principal’s instructions. Although most of them were indignant that I would ask for a re-write, the pieces eventually were published in a special section of the weekly community newspaper I was publishing at the time. In an attempt to provide these students with an ongoing, real-world learning experience, I agreed to make the column a monthly feature. Unfortunately, neither the teacher nor the students were willing or able to meet my deadlines. And the quality of work was dreadful and spiraling downward, with none of the writers adhering in any way to the most basic principles we had discussed – and that they had used when writing their initial articles. In a few cases, when students had apparently tried to write in a journalistic style, their articles had been badly re-written or incorrectly edited by a teacher not involved with the program. I eventually called the whole thing to a halt, and branded it as a lose-lose situation.

I should have known better. I should have remembered that creativity and initiative do not flourish in an atmosphere of coercion. While specific talents and interests deserve special training, the best way to help children develop their creative abilities is to surround them with creativity and allow them to pursue their own ideas and projects in the real world. If adults model creative thinking, children will follow their lead. If adults try to look at the world in new ways and to find new ways to do conventional things, children will do the same thing.

Aside from being a non-stimulating environment for all but a few students who have been ranked as part of an elite group, much of the school mentality actually undermines innovation. There is little room for true individuality in a school setting. Nor, for that matter, is there room for any part of the creative process, which is uneven, bumpy and non-standardized. Pressure to produce – as well as evaluation, judgment, criticism and comparison – kills any original thinking and creativity that manage to survive.
Posted: 2005/04/10 5:27 PM

Dying Not to Eat – April 4, 2005
There was international media coverage of the lead-up to last week’s death of Terri Schiavo, the Florida woman who had been in what doctors call a “persistent vegetative state” for many years until her husband had her feeding tube removed. The focus on the legal wrangling instigated by her parents and the protests from the right-to-lifers obscured reports that the heart attack she suffered at age 26, which created her brain damage, was caused by bulimia, a severe eating disorder. Given that history, I have to wonder if she would have wanted to be kept alive for so many years by being force-fed!

According to the National Association for Anorexia Nervosa and Associated Eating Disorders (ANAD), eating disorders like bulimia and anorexia affect eight million people in the United States alone. Bulimia is considered a serious mental illness, and the constant purging can lead to a variety of physical ailments, including a loss of the mineral potassium, which can contribute to heart problems and even, as in Schiavo’s case, death. Many psychiatrists now consider eating disorders to be a subset of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), with the obsession settling on body image as opposed to things like hand-washing. With the increasingly sophisticated advertising industry’s use of psychographic analysis to motivate people to buy stuff, many of those with eating disorders have clearly been influenced by marketing messages designed to create needs that they wouldn’t otherwise have. One only has to look at the emaciated models in fashion magazines to understand that some people would want to look that way…and feel badly if they don’t. There is also speculation that eating disorders are about control; by controlling their own bodies – albeit in an unhealthy way – young people who feel out of control, due to adolescent hormones, regimented schools or strict parents, for instance, are comforted. (And once again, the irony in Schiavo’s situation surfaces as one thinks about her parents who had such a fierce desire to control her recent life and death and who seemed to me to have been in denial about both her bulimia and the extent of her brain damage.)

ANAD has made the link between Terri Schiavo’s death and eating disorders. Perhaps now that the circus atmosphere that surrounded her last few years has abated, her death may help those young women who are so vulnerable to exploitative advertising messages that they eat themselves to death.
Posted: 2005/04/04 5:35 PM

Trusting Ourselves and Our Children Is Not Regressive – April 1, 2005
Life learning families make choices that differ in some ways from current societal norms, and therefore sometimes struggle with the tensions and seeming contradictions inherent in those choices. Giving our children the honor of learning without schooling is bound to bump up against many other issues, from how a family makes its living to how the chores get done.

I have been exploring some of those issues – both in my own life and in a broader context – as a result of the reader feedback I’ve been receiving to a recent Life Learning magazine column (see my March 21, 2005 blog entry – “Learning Neatness”). As part of that exploration, I am reading a book entitled The Paradox of Natural Mothering (2002, Temple University Press). Academic Chris Bobel has massaged her dissertation into a book that portrays a group of mothers engaged in homeschooling, natural health care, voluntary simplicity and various attachment parenting practices. The paradox in the title arises from what Bobel sees as a conflict between a lifestyle that is both progressive and regressive (i.e. anti-feminist). While the women she interviewed feel they are making choices in their lives, Bobel denigrates these as non-choices that are biologically determined because they are emotionally-based rather than intellectually thought-out. (Presumably, if they’d thought about their choices, they’d have behaved like more conventional mothers!) What these mothers are, in fact, doing is trusting their emotions, their intuition, their bodies and their children.

Perhaps our societal agendas have swung us so far away from the inherent “knowing” that characterizes primitive societies that so-called “natural parenting” seems to contradict the principles of equality for women. My own life – and I would say those of the women Bobel has portrayed – is an ongoing pursuit of the balance between trust and intellect. Trust, after all, is one of the cornerstones of non-coercive parenting and life learning. Taking ownership of our own education and allowing our children to own theirs requires trust in what we call “human nature”. In the case of our children, that means trusting that they will behave sociably and want to learn things, including both academic knowledge and social skills...with our help and example, of course.
Posted: 2005/04/01 12:10 PM

Return to current weblog
Comments? Suggestions? Email Us

copyright © Wendy Priesnitz 2007

Topics & Passions:

natural learning
simplicity
environment
parenting
creativity / writing
books

~

What I'm reading:

Ten Thousand Roses by Judy Rebick (2005, Penguin Books)
Mother-Daughter Wisdom - Creating a Legacy of Physical and Emotional Health
by Christiane Northrup (2005, Bantam)
Blink - The Power of Thinking Without Thinking
by Malcolm Gladwell (2005, Little, Brown & Company)
Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention
by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (1997, Perennial)

~

What I'm Listening To: 

Careless Love by Madeleine Peyroux (Rounder Records)
Solo
by Yo-Yo Ma (Silk Road/Sony)
Red Dragonfly
by Jane Bunnett and the Penderecki String Quartet (EMI Music)
Slow
by Ann Hampton Callaway (Shanachie Records)

~

Fav Bookmarks:

Deep Fun
Junkyard Sports
Council for a Livable World
The Guardian
John Taylor Gatto
Organic Consumers Association
Free2be
Common Dreams
New Scientist
News Link

~

Fav Quotes
Art, Writing, Creativity
Life & Living
Learning
Environment