Our education system was designed to fight
and win political and economic wars. We needed people to build bombs, radar
and airplanes. We now have different problems, such as climate change, hunger,
toxic waste, terrorism and looming shortages of clean water. These issues
require new types of solutions.
Unfortunately, our public education system
is not geared to solve these modern problems. Although today’s young people
are living in a sophisticated, fast-paced, highly technological world, the
schools we make them attend are still operating much like they did a century
ago. The dilemma is that as long as we educate people in traditional ways,
they will perpetuate the current way of doing things. In order to make change,
we must fundamentally transform how we think about learning and the position
of individuals in society.
By our very use of words like
“teaching” and “schooling,” we seem to accept the idea that some
people at the top are doing things to other people farther down the totem
pole. Public education reflects our society’s paternalistic, hierarchical
worldview, which exploits children in the same way it takes the earth’s
resources for granted. That is no way help children grow up into
problem-solving, assumption-challenging, compassionate citizens who think
independently and participate in the life of their communities and countries.
Sociologists, futurists, politicians,
entrepreneurs and even some educators talk about the need for a revolution in
education. But what they envision really amounts to nothing more than
tinkering with the old, crumbling structure. Although there have been many
cosmetic alterations to public education over the past century, the
traditional blueprint for education persists...and it looks like a factory.
From time to time alternative schools and programs emerge that are teaching a
so-called “child-centered curriculum”, or that are using team-teaching or
a program of integrated studies or some other new pedagogy.
But the context of these well-meaning and
sometimes less oppressive alternatives is still hierarchy and coercion. Most
people still believe that children and young people must be made to go to
school or else they won’t become educated. And even the most radical critics
of the school system seem not to want to abandon the belief that children must
be processed for a life as producers and consumers..
This is not surprising, since education is
an industry. Our present system was designed to prepare workers for an
Industrial Age culture, teaching authoritarianism, self-repression, and strict
obedience to the clock. True to the industrial model, control over what is to
be learned rests somewhere inside a huge bureaucracy that oversees both
teachers and students.
Getting rid of the factory model of public
education challenges not just our assumptions about how children learn, but a
variety of agendas related to who manages the affairs of our communities and
how corporations make profits. It is those vested interests which allow
otherwise insightful and community-minded people to ignore the scandalous
malfunctioning of our billion dollar education industry.
But change will not happen until we give up
on the hierarchical, coercive, industrial model of education – whether it
looks like a public school, a charter school, a private school, or a home
school. We must deschool society, as author Ivan Illich put it back in 1970,
rather than merely reform the institution. We must demolish the institution of
schooling because it impedes learning and enslaves children. Then we need to
put both money and creativity into creating opportunities and infrastructures
that respect children and help them learn.
To do that, we must challenge our dearly
held assumptions about the purpose and process of education. These are
assumptions that have created a society that chooses consumption over action,
that favors developing new weapons to relating to each other, that encourages
production over conservation. Overturning these assumptions will take time,
but unschoolers and democratic school advocates are making that change, one
child at a time.
copyright (c) Wendy Priesnitz 2010